根据返排分析对页岩性能进行排名,现场案例

A. Ibrahim, Ahmed Assem, M. Ibrahim, C. Pieprzica
{"title":"根据返排分析对页岩性能进行排名,现场案例","authors":"A. Ibrahim, Ahmed Assem, M. Ibrahim, C. Pieprzica","doi":"10.2118/197792-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In recent years, in unconventional reservoirs, main fracture parameters including fracture permeability and fracture volume can be early evaluated using flowback data analysis. For analysis purposes, diagnostic plots, straight-line methods, and simulation model history-matching techniques are utilized. Usually, immediate gas and water production occur during flowback in shale gas wells.\n In this paper, solution of water diffusivity equation for different flow regimes during the early time of well life was used to analyze water performance. These flow regimes were determined based on the diagnostic plot of water rate vs. time. The analysis from Water RTA was used to calculate initial water in place (OWIP) and fracture parameters. The difference between the OWIP and the injected fracturing fluid was correlated against the formation water saturation.\n The main conclusions from this analysis are; 1) High quality shale if the OWIP equal to the total injected water volume, and water-production data usually do not show the transient period and in some cases, boundary dominated flow (BDF) is present. 2) Low quality shale if the OWIP is greater than the total injected fracture fluid volume, and transient flow regimes are expected. High quality shale is good candidate for soaking process. The well performance increases after soaking process in the case of low formation water comparing to the high-water saturation wells.\n Honoring the flowback data can help to estimate the fracture geometry and indicate the quality of the shale formation.","PeriodicalId":11328,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ranking Shale Performance from Water Flowback Analysis, Field Case\",\"authors\":\"A. Ibrahim, Ahmed Assem, M. Ibrahim, C. Pieprzica\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/197792-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In recent years, in unconventional reservoirs, main fracture parameters including fracture permeability and fracture volume can be early evaluated using flowback data analysis. For analysis purposes, diagnostic plots, straight-line methods, and simulation model history-matching techniques are utilized. Usually, immediate gas and water production occur during flowback in shale gas wells.\\n In this paper, solution of water diffusivity equation for different flow regimes during the early time of well life was used to analyze water performance. These flow regimes were determined based on the diagnostic plot of water rate vs. time. The analysis from Water RTA was used to calculate initial water in place (OWIP) and fracture parameters. The difference between the OWIP and the injected fracturing fluid was correlated against the formation water saturation.\\n The main conclusions from this analysis are; 1) High quality shale if the OWIP equal to the total injected water volume, and water-production data usually do not show the transient period and in some cases, boundary dominated flow (BDF) is present. 2) Low quality shale if the OWIP is greater than the total injected fracture fluid volume, and transient flow regimes are expected. High quality shale is good candidate for soaking process. The well performance increases after soaking process in the case of low formation water comparing to the high-water saturation wells.\\n Honoring the flowback data can help to estimate the fracture geometry and indicate the quality of the shale formation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/197792-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197792-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来,在非常规油藏中,利用返排数据分析可以早期评价裂缝渗透率和裂缝体积等主要裂缝参数。为了分析目的,使用了诊断图、直线方法和模拟模型历史匹配技术。通常,页岩气井在反排过程中会立即产生气和水。本文采用不同流态下的水扩散方程解法,分析了井生命早期的水动态。这些流动形式是根据流速与时间的诊断图确定的。利用水RTA数据分析计算初始含水(OWIP)和裂缝参数。OWIP与注入压裂液之间的差异与地层含水饱和度相关。分析得出的主要结论有:1)高质量页岩,如果OWIP等于总注入水量,产水数据通常不显示瞬态,在某些情况下,存在边界主导流(BDF)。2)如果OWIP大于注入的总压裂液体积,则页岩质量较低,并且预计会出现瞬态流动状态。优质页岩是进行浸渍工艺的良好选择。与高含水饱和度井相比,低含水条件下浸泡后的井性能有所提高。利用反排数据可以帮助估计裂缝的几何形状,并表明页岩地层的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ranking Shale Performance from Water Flowback Analysis, Field Case
In recent years, in unconventional reservoirs, main fracture parameters including fracture permeability and fracture volume can be early evaluated using flowback data analysis. For analysis purposes, diagnostic plots, straight-line methods, and simulation model history-matching techniques are utilized. Usually, immediate gas and water production occur during flowback in shale gas wells. In this paper, solution of water diffusivity equation for different flow regimes during the early time of well life was used to analyze water performance. These flow regimes were determined based on the diagnostic plot of water rate vs. time. The analysis from Water RTA was used to calculate initial water in place (OWIP) and fracture parameters. The difference between the OWIP and the injected fracturing fluid was correlated against the formation water saturation. The main conclusions from this analysis are; 1) High quality shale if the OWIP equal to the total injected water volume, and water-production data usually do not show the transient period and in some cases, boundary dominated flow (BDF) is present. 2) Low quality shale if the OWIP is greater than the total injected fracture fluid volume, and transient flow regimes are expected. High quality shale is good candidate for soaking process. The well performance increases after soaking process in the case of low formation water comparing to the high-water saturation wells. Honoring the flowback data can help to estimate the fracture geometry and indicate the quality of the shale formation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信