活的伊斯兰哲学:对Mulyadhi Kartanegara思想的反思

Nuruddin Al Akbar
{"title":"活的伊斯兰哲学:对Mulyadhi Kartanegara思想的反思","authors":"Nuruddin Al Akbar","doi":"10.18860/ua.v24i1.20841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study elaborates Mulyadhi Kartanegara's thoughts regarding the continuity of Islamic philosophy after the Ibn Rushd era. This research is a case study-based qualitative research using a review on Kartanegara's travel notes and research reports as the object. This research also uses other relevant studies to understand Kartanegara’s big idea. This study concludes that, although the idea on Islamic Philosophy does not perish in the Iranian region has been a thesis recognized by many researchers, Kartanegara explore further the dynamics of Islamic philosophical traditions in Iran since the post-Ibn Rushd era. He was dissatisfied with the explanations of many experts who emphasized the elaboration of a prominent philosopher, Mullâ Sadrâ, while ignoring the role of minor philosophers in supporting the continuity of the Islamic philosophical tradition in Iran. This research found, Kartanegara could construct the argument that Islamic philosophy is a living tradition marked by the continuity of ideas developed by minor and major philosophers. Mulyadhi also showed that Islamic philosophy has relevance for overcoming contemporary challenges, primarily related to the problem of knowledge production.","PeriodicalId":53390,"journal":{"name":"Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LIVING ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY: Reflection on Mulyadhi Kartanegara's Thought\",\"authors\":\"Nuruddin Al Akbar\",\"doi\":\"10.18860/ua.v24i1.20841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study elaborates Mulyadhi Kartanegara's thoughts regarding the continuity of Islamic philosophy after the Ibn Rushd era. This research is a case study-based qualitative research using a review on Kartanegara's travel notes and research reports as the object. This research also uses other relevant studies to understand Kartanegara’s big idea. This study concludes that, although the idea on Islamic Philosophy does not perish in the Iranian region has been a thesis recognized by many researchers, Kartanegara explore further the dynamics of Islamic philosophical traditions in Iran since the post-Ibn Rushd era. He was dissatisfied with the explanations of many experts who emphasized the elaboration of a prominent philosopher, Mullâ Sadrâ, while ignoring the role of minor philosophers in supporting the continuity of the Islamic philosophical tradition in Iran. This research found, Kartanegara could construct the argument that Islamic philosophy is a living tradition marked by the continuity of ideas developed by minor and major philosophers. Mulyadhi also showed that Islamic philosophy has relevance for overcoming contemporary challenges, primarily related to the problem of knowledge production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v24i1.20841\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v24i1.20841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究阐述了Mulyadhi Kartanegara关于伊本·鲁世德时代之后伊斯兰哲学连续性的思想。本研究是以Kartanegara的游记和研究报告为对象,进行个案研究的定性研究。本研究还利用其他相关研究来理解Kartanegara的大思想。本研究的结论是,尽管伊斯兰哲学在伊朗地区并没有消亡,这一观点已被许多研究者认可,但Kartanegara进一步探讨了自伊本·拉什德后时代以来伊朗伊斯兰哲学传统的动态。他对许多专家的解释感到不满,这些专家强调著名哲学家mull sadr的阐述,而忽视了小哲学家在支持伊朗伊斯兰哲学传统的连续性方面的作用。这项研究发现,Kartanegara可以构建这样一个论点,即伊斯兰哲学是一个活的传统,其特征是由小哲学家和大哲学家发展的思想的连续性。Mulyadhi还表明,伊斯兰哲学与克服当代挑战具有相关性,这些挑战主要与知识生产问题有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LIVING ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY: Reflection on Mulyadhi Kartanegara's Thought
This study elaborates Mulyadhi Kartanegara's thoughts regarding the continuity of Islamic philosophy after the Ibn Rushd era. This research is a case study-based qualitative research using a review on Kartanegara's travel notes and research reports as the object. This research also uses other relevant studies to understand Kartanegara’s big idea. This study concludes that, although the idea on Islamic Philosophy does not perish in the Iranian region has been a thesis recognized by many researchers, Kartanegara explore further the dynamics of Islamic philosophical traditions in Iran since the post-Ibn Rushd era. He was dissatisfied with the explanations of many experts who emphasized the elaboration of a prominent philosopher, Mullâ Sadrâ, while ignoring the role of minor philosophers in supporting the continuity of the Islamic philosophical tradition in Iran. This research found, Kartanegara could construct the argument that Islamic philosophy is a living tradition marked by the continuity of ideas developed by minor and major philosophers. Mulyadhi also showed that Islamic philosophy has relevance for overcoming contemporary challenges, primarily related to the problem of knowledge production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信