印度尼西亚医学荣誉委员会在解决医患之间的医疗纠纷时的立场

Kastania Lintang, Hasnati Hasnati, Bahrun Azmi
{"title":"印度尼西亚医学荣誉委员会在解决医患之间的医疗纠纷时的立场","authors":"Kastania Lintang, Hasnati Hasnati, Bahrun Azmi","doi":"10.24090/volksgeist.v4i2.5267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to analyze the position of the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council in the Settlement of Disputes between Doctors and Patients. Medical disputes due to alleged violations of medical discipline should be resolved through the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council, however currently there are still medical disputes that are reported to the court without going through the Indonesian Medical Doctors Honorary Council. This study uses a normative juridical research method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study are based on Article 66 paragraph (1) and paragraph (3) of Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practices, there is still legal uncertainty regarding the resolution of medical disputes between doctors and patients, because the word \"can\" contained in paragraph (1) can mean that the complaint against the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council may or may not be made. Whereas in paragraph (3) it is stated that it is possible to resolve medical disputes through the courts, which can cause medical dispute resolution to be carried out through the courts.","PeriodicalId":34760,"journal":{"name":"Volksgeist","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kedudukan Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis antara Dokter dan Pasien\",\"authors\":\"Kastania Lintang, Hasnati Hasnati, Bahrun Azmi\",\"doi\":\"10.24090/volksgeist.v4i2.5267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to analyze the position of the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council in the Settlement of Disputes between Doctors and Patients. Medical disputes due to alleged violations of medical discipline should be resolved through the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council, however currently there are still medical disputes that are reported to the court without going through the Indonesian Medical Doctors Honorary Council. This study uses a normative juridical research method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study are based on Article 66 paragraph (1) and paragraph (3) of Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practices, there is still legal uncertainty regarding the resolution of medical disputes between doctors and patients, because the word \\\"can\\\" contained in paragraph (1) can mean that the complaint against the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council may or may not be made. Whereas in paragraph (3) it is stated that it is possible to resolve medical disputes through the courts, which can cause medical dispute resolution to be carried out through the courts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volksgeist\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volksgeist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v4i2.5267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volksgeist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v4i2.5267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在分析印尼医学学科荣誉理事会在解决医患纠纷中的地位。因涉嫌违反医学纪律而引起的医疗纠纷应通过印度尼西亚医学纪律荣誉理事会解决,但目前仍有一些医疗纠纷没有通过印度尼西亚医生荣誉理事会向法院报告。本研究采用规范的法律研究方法,结合法规研究与概念研究。这项研究的结果基于2004年关于医疗行为的第29号法律第66条第(1)款和第(3)款,在解决医生和病人之间的医疗纠纷方面仍然存在法律上的不确定性,因为第(1)款中包含的"可以"一词可能意味着可以或不可以向印度尼西亚医学纪律荣誉委员会提出申诉。鉴于第(3)款指出,可以通过法院解决医疗纠纷,这可能导致通过法院解决医疗纠纷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kedudukan Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis antara Dokter dan Pasien
This article aims to analyze the position of the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council in the Settlement of Disputes between Doctors and Patients. Medical disputes due to alleged violations of medical discipline should be resolved through the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council, however currently there are still medical disputes that are reported to the court without going through the Indonesian Medical Doctors Honorary Council. This study uses a normative juridical research method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study are based on Article 66 paragraph (1) and paragraph (3) of Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practices, there is still legal uncertainty regarding the resolution of medical disputes between doctors and patients, because the word "can" contained in paragraph (1) can mean that the complaint against the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council may or may not be made. Whereas in paragraph (3) it is stated that it is possible to resolve medical disputes through the courts, which can cause medical dispute resolution to be carried out through the courts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信