论教育中的历史主义与教育模式的转变

O. Vlasova
{"title":"论教育中的历史主义与教育模式的转变","authors":"O. Vlasova","doi":"10.15293/2658-6762.2205.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The paper examines modern historicist discussions in education. The purpose of the research is to determine the specifics of discussions on historicism in Education and show their influence on the transformation of educational models in higher education. Materials and Methods. The work implements integrated and interdisciplinary approaches, comparative methods, perspectivist approach, and dialectical method. The article reviews and analysis monographs and research papers published between 1990 and 2021 which address the issues of classical historicism, anti-historicism and new historicism in education. Results. The authors summarize the main directions of discussions in education devoted to the problems of historicism. It is pointed out that within the framework of these problematic discussions, the new historicism and intellectual history allowed the sciences to move away from linear models of history to contextual ones. The productive features of ‘new stories’ in education are highlighted: the possibility of discussing conflict interpretations in a dialogue, taking into account the multicultural mechanisms of the historical process, development of critical thinking and practical approaches. The main result of the rethinking of historicism in education is transition from the theoretical orientation to practice in the context of the current situation based on the analysis of the past. It allows to combine several sciences and disciplines in the educational process. Conclusions. The article concludes that problematic discussions on historicism in higher education are extremely important for updating educational strategies and for structural renovation of curricula. They lead to the contextual teaching, requiring its practical adjustment, as well as the development of interdisciplinary educational trajectories.","PeriodicalId":21621,"journal":{"name":"Science for Education Today","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discussions on historicism in education and transformation of educational models\",\"authors\":\"O. Vlasova\",\"doi\":\"10.15293/2658-6762.2205.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The paper examines modern historicist discussions in education. The purpose of the research is to determine the specifics of discussions on historicism in Education and show their influence on the transformation of educational models in higher education. Materials and Methods. The work implements integrated and interdisciplinary approaches, comparative methods, perspectivist approach, and dialectical method. The article reviews and analysis monographs and research papers published between 1990 and 2021 which address the issues of classical historicism, anti-historicism and new historicism in education. Results. The authors summarize the main directions of discussions in education devoted to the problems of historicism. It is pointed out that within the framework of these problematic discussions, the new historicism and intellectual history allowed the sciences to move away from linear models of history to contextual ones. The productive features of ‘new stories’ in education are highlighted: the possibility of discussing conflict interpretations in a dialogue, taking into account the multicultural mechanisms of the historical process, development of critical thinking and practical approaches. The main result of the rethinking of historicism in education is transition from the theoretical orientation to practice in the context of the current situation based on the analysis of the past. It allows to combine several sciences and disciplines in the educational process. Conclusions. The article concludes that problematic discussions on historicism in higher education are extremely important for updating educational strategies and for structural renovation of curricula. They lead to the contextual teaching, requiring its practical adjustment, as well as the development of interdisciplinary educational trajectories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science for Education Today\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science for Education Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2205.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science for Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2205.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。本文考察了现代教育中的历史主义讨论。研究的目的是确定历史主义在教育中的具体讨论,并显示其对高等教育教育模式转变的影响。材料与方法。本工作采用综合跨学科方法、比较方法、透视方法和辩证方法。本文回顾和分析了1990年至2021年间发表的关于教育中的古典历史主义、反历史主义和新历史主义问题的专著和研究论文。结果。作者总结了致力于历史主义问题的教育讨论的主要方向。作者指出,在这些有问题的讨论的框架内,新历史主义和思想史允许科学从历史的线性模型转向上下文模型。强调了教育中“新故事”的生产性特征:在对话中讨论冲突解释的可能性,考虑到历史进程的多元文化机制,批判性思维和实践方法的发展。历史主义教育反思的主要结果是在对过去的分析的基础上,从理论取向转向现实情境下的实践取向。它允许在教育过程中结合几门科学和学科。结论。文章认为,在高等教育中对历史主义问题进行探讨,对于更新教育策略和课程结构改革具有重要意义。这导致了情境化教学,需要情境化教学的实践调整,也需要跨学科教育轨迹的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discussions on historicism in education and transformation of educational models
Introduction. The paper examines modern historicist discussions in education. The purpose of the research is to determine the specifics of discussions on historicism in Education and show their influence on the transformation of educational models in higher education. Materials and Methods. The work implements integrated and interdisciplinary approaches, comparative methods, perspectivist approach, and dialectical method. The article reviews and analysis monographs and research papers published between 1990 and 2021 which address the issues of classical historicism, anti-historicism and new historicism in education. Results. The authors summarize the main directions of discussions in education devoted to the problems of historicism. It is pointed out that within the framework of these problematic discussions, the new historicism and intellectual history allowed the sciences to move away from linear models of history to contextual ones. The productive features of ‘new stories’ in education are highlighted: the possibility of discussing conflict interpretations in a dialogue, taking into account the multicultural mechanisms of the historical process, development of critical thinking and practical approaches. The main result of the rethinking of historicism in education is transition from the theoretical orientation to practice in the context of the current situation based on the analysis of the past. It allows to combine several sciences and disciplines in the educational process. Conclusions. The article concludes that problematic discussions on historicism in higher education are extremely important for updating educational strategies and for structural renovation of curricula. They lead to the contextual teaching, requiring its practical adjustment, as well as the development of interdisciplinary educational trajectories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信