关于人与市场:哈耶克,男子气概和新自由主义

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 ECONOMICS
S. Garlick
{"title":"关于人与市场:哈耶克,男子气概和新自由主义","authors":"S. Garlick","doi":"10.1080/03085147.2022.2131273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A key aspect of Friedrich von Hayek’s thought is the importance he places on the concept of complexity and the way that it limits human capacities for knowledge and control. Interrogating the intersection of complexity, neoliberal theory and systems of gender relations, this paper examines the place of masculinity in Hayek’s work. Reading against the grain of Hayek’s texts, I draw out the gendered assumptions that are embedded in them to consider how hegemonic masculinities may provide sustenance to neoliberalism. Focusing on The road to serfdom and The fatal conceit, the paper argues that Hayek ultimately fails to fully embrace complexity because his texts enact and rely upon a masculine subject position that limits awareness of human embeddedness in social and natural systems.","PeriodicalId":48030,"journal":{"name":"Economy and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Of men and markets: Hayek, masculinity and neoliberalism\",\"authors\":\"S. Garlick\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03085147.2022.2131273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract A key aspect of Friedrich von Hayek’s thought is the importance he places on the concept of complexity and the way that it limits human capacities for knowledge and control. Interrogating the intersection of complexity, neoliberal theory and systems of gender relations, this paper examines the place of masculinity in Hayek’s work. Reading against the grain of Hayek’s texts, I draw out the gendered assumptions that are embedded in them to consider how hegemonic masculinities may provide sustenance to neoliberalism. Focusing on The road to serfdom and The fatal conceit, the paper argues that Hayek ultimately fails to fully embrace complexity because his texts enact and rely upon a masculine subject position that limits awareness of human embeddedness in social and natural systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economy and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economy and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2022.2131273\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economy and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2022.2131273","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

弗里德里希·冯·哈耶克思想的一个关键方面是他对复杂性概念的重视,以及它限制人类知识和控制能力的方式。本文探讨了复杂性、新自由主义理论和性别关系系统的交叉点,考察了哈耶克作品中男性气质的地位。在阅读哈耶克的文本时,我提出了其中隐含的性别假设,以思考霸权的男性气概如何为新自由主义提供支撑。本文以《通往农奴制的道路》和《致命的自负》为重点,认为哈耶克最终未能完全拥抱复杂性,因为他的文本制定并依赖于一种男性主体的地位,这种地位限制了对人类在社会和自然系统中的嵌入性的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Of men and markets: Hayek, masculinity and neoliberalism
Abstract A key aspect of Friedrich von Hayek’s thought is the importance he places on the concept of complexity and the way that it limits human capacities for knowledge and control. Interrogating the intersection of complexity, neoliberal theory and systems of gender relations, this paper examines the place of masculinity in Hayek’s work. Reading against the grain of Hayek’s texts, I draw out the gendered assumptions that are embedded in them to consider how hegemonic masculinities may provide sustenance to neoliberalism. Focusing on The road to serfdom and The fatal conceit, the paper argues that Hayek ultimately fails to fully embrace complexity because his texts enact and rely upon a masculine subject position that limits awareness of human embeddedness in social and natural systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: This radical interdisciplinary journal of theory and politics continues to be one of the most exciting and influential resources for scholars in the social sciences worldwide. As one of the field"s leading scholarly refereed journals, Economy and Society plays a key role in promoting new debates and currents of social thought. For 37 years, the journal has explored the social sciences in the broadest interdisciplinary sense, in innovative articles from some of the world"s leading sociologists and anthropologists, political scientists, legal theorists, philosophers, economists and other renowned scholars.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信