为什么哀悼者不做几何?忏悔者圣马克西姆斯和神学家圣格列高利的演说

IF 0.2 0 ART
A. Jeftić
{"title":"为什么哀悼者不做几何?忏悔者圣马克西姆斯和神学家圣格列高利的演说","authors":"A. Jeftić","doi":"10.2298/zmsdn2177079j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with St Maximus? Ambiguum 14 in which this Byzantine theologian interprets a paragraph from the famous First theological oration of St Gregory the Theologian. By way of comparison, the Cappadocian states that Eunomian theological discussions are misplaced in the same manner as doing geometry would be in the time of mourning. Maximus faced a rather difficult task of interpreting this odd comparison. In response to this challenge, he offered several different interpretations, admitting that he would be grateful to anyone who might offer a better solution of this ambiguity. Some scholars who dealt with the text criticism of this very oration did precisely this by suggesting that ?the geometry? (?????????) represented a lapsus calami which replaced the original phrase ?the immoderate laughter? (???? ???????), while others refused to accept their proposal. Reflections are offered in conclusion on the authority present in the patristic texts, both in case of Maximus as well as in the case of contemporary patristic scholars.","PeriodicalId":40081,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why don’t mourners do geometry? St Maximus the Confessor and St Gregory the Theologian’s Oration 27\",\"authors\":\"A. Jeftić\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/zmsdn2177079j\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper deals with St Maximus? Ambiguum 14 in which this Byzantine theologian interprets a paragraph from the famous First theological oration of St Gregory the Theologian. By way of comparison, the Cappadocian states that Eunomian theological discussions are misplaced in the same manner as doing geometry would be in the time of mourning. Maximus faced a rather difficult task of interpreting this odd comparison. In response to this challenge, he offered several different interpretations, admitting that he would be grateful to anyone who might offer a better solution of this ambiguity. Some scholars who dealt with the text criticism of this very oration did precisely this by suggesting that ?the geometry? (?????????) represented a lapsus calami which replaced the original phrase ?the immoderate laughter? (???? ???????), while others refused to accept their proposal. Reflections are offered in conclusion on the authority present in the patristic texts, both in case of Maximus as well as in the case of contemporary patristic scholars.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn2177079j\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn2177079j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇论文是关于圣马克西姆斯的?这个拜占庭神学家解释了圣格列高利神学家著名的第一次神学演说中的一段。通过比较,《卡帕多西亚书》指出,伊诺米人的神学讨论是错位的,就像在哀悼时期做几何一样。马克西姆斯面临着一项相当困难的任务,要解释这个奇怪的比较。为了应对这一挑战,他提出了几种不同的解释,并承认他将感谢任何可能为这种模糊性提供更好解决方案的人。一些学者在处理这篇演讲的文本批评时,正是这样做的,他们认为,几何学?(?????????)代表了一个lapsus calami,取代了原来的短语?(? ????????),而其他人则拒绝接受他们的提议。反思提供了在教父文本的权威结论,无论是在马克西姆斯的情况下,以及在当代教父学者的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why don’t mourners do geometry? St Maximus the Confessor and St Gregory the Theologian’s Oration 27
The paper deals with St Maximus? Ambiguum 14 in which this Byzantine theologian interprets a paragraph from the famous First theological oration of St Gregory the Theologian. By way of comparison, the Cappadocian states that Eunomian theological discussions are misplaced in the same manner as doing geometry would be in the time of mourning. Maximus faced a rather difficult task of interpreting this odd comparison. In response to this challenge, he offered several different interpretations, admitting that he would be grateful to anyone who might offer a better solution of this ambiguity. Some scholars who dealt with the text criticism of this very oration did precisely this by suggesting that ?the geometry? (?????????) represented a lapsus calami which replaced the original phrase ?the immoderate laughter? (???? ???????), while others refused to accept their proposal. Reflections are offered in conclusion on the authority present in the patristic texts, both in case of Maximus as well as in the case of contemporary patristic scholars.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信