公牛暴露对萨希瓦尔小母牛发情行为强度的影响

S. Choudhary, M. Kamboj, Nitin Raheja, C. KotreshPrasad, Pawan Singh, Nishanth Kumar, Deepandita Barman, M. Bhakat
{"title":"公牛暴露对萨希瓦尔小母牛发情行为强度的影响","authors":"S. Choudhary, M. Kamboj, Nitin Raheja, C. KotreshPrasad, Pawan Singh, Nishanth Kumar, Deepandita Barman, M. Bhakat","doi":"10.33785/IJDS.2019.V72I03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study was conducted to study the influence of the presence of a bull on the behavioural signs of estrus expressed by Sahiwal heifers. For this experiment, a total of 24 Sahiwal heifers were allotted to 3 groups (T 0 , T 1 and T 2 ) of 8 animals each, based on the age and body weight. In T 0 , the heifers were isolated from the bull; in T 1 group, the heifers were in contact with the bull through a fenceline exposure and in T2 group, the heifers were exposed through a fenceline contact (24 hours) with bull along with direct contact (for 6 hours) through another bull in the heifer shed. Estrus detection was done by bulls in T 1 and T 2 heifers group whereas in T 0 group, heifers heat expectancy chart and visual observation of behavioural signs of estrus was used for estrus detection. Overall mean intensity of sniffing/licking, tail raising, micturition, chin resting and allowing mounting attempts during silent estrus in T 0 was largely weak (88.64%) and in T 1 heifers group, intensity was weak to moderate (60.05 and 34.58 %) whereas, in T 2 group, percentage of weak, moderate and intense was 38.5 %, 27.0 % and 34.4 % respectively. The per cent mean intensity of estrus behaviour in second estrus was weak to moderate (71.875 and 28.12) in T 0 , whereas in T 1 group, intensity was largely weak to moderate (42.9 % and 41.3%) and intensity of cardinal signs of estrus in T 2 was mostly moderate to intense in nature (31.9 % and 57.7%). It can be concluded that bull biostimulation of Sahiwal heifers through direct contact plus fenceline contact was more effective in increasing estrus behaviour intensity as compared to the only fenceline contact. Most prominent cardinal symptoms of estrus in biostimulated as well as non-biostimulated Sahiwal heifers were sniffing and licking, micturition, tail raising, allowing mounting attempts and chin resting.","PeriodicalId":23489,"journal":{"name":"Vol 72, No 3 (2019)","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of bull exposure on the behavioural intensity of estrus in Sahiwal heifers (Bos Indicus)\",\"authors\":\"S. Choudhary, M. Kamboj, Nitin Raheja, C. KotreshPrasad, Pawan Singh, Nishanth Kumar, Deepandita Barman, M. Bhakat\",\"doi\":\"10.33785/IJDS.2019.V72I03.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study was conducted to study the influence of the presence of a bull on the behavioural signs of estrus expressed by Sahiwal heifers. For this experiment, a total of 24 Sahiwal heifers were allotted to 3 groups (T 0 , T 1 and T 2 ) of 8 animals each, based on the age and body weight. In T 0 , the heifers were isolated from the bull; in T 1 group, the heifers were in contact with the bull through a fenceline exposure and in T2 group, the heifers were exposed through a fenceline contact (24 hours) with bull along with direct contact (for 6 hours) through another bull in the heifer shed. Estrus detection was done by bulls in T 1 and T 2 heifers group whereas in T 0 group, heifers heat expectancy chart and visual observation of behavioural signs of estrus was used for estrus detection. Overall mean intensity of sniffing/licking, tail raising, micturition, chin resting and allowing mounting attempts during silent estrus in T 0 was largely weak (88.64%) and in T 1 heifers group, intensity was weak to moderate (60.05 and 34.58 %) whereas, in T 2 group, percentage of weak, moderate and intense was 38.5 %, 27.0 % and 34.4 % respectively. The per cent mean intensity of estrus behaviour in second estrus was weak to moderate (71.875 and 28.12) in T 0 , whereas in T 1 group, intensity was largely weak to moderate (42.9 % and 41.3%) and intensity of cardinal signs of estrus in T 2 was mostly moderate to intense in nature (31.9 % and 57.7%). It can be concluded that bull biostimulation of Sahiwal heifers through direct contact plus fenceline contact was more effective in increasing estrus behaviour intensity as compared to the only fenceline contact. Most prominent cardinal symptoms of estrus in biostimulated as well as non-biostimulated Sahiwal heifers were sniffing and licking, micturition, tail raising, allowing mounting attempts and chin resting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vol 72, No 3 (2019)\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vol 72, No 3 (2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33785/IJDS.2019.V72I03.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vol 72, No 3 (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33785/IJDS.2019.V72I03.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在研究公牛的存在对Sahiwal小母牛表达的发情行为体征的影响。试验选用24头萨希瓦尔小母牛,根据日龄和体重分为3组(t0、t1、t2),每组8头。在2010年,将小母牛与公牛隔离;t1组母牛通过围栏接触公牛,T2组母牛通过围栏接触公牛(24小时),并在母牛棚内与另一头公牛直接接触(6小时)。t1组和t2组用公牛进行发情检测,t0组用母牛热期望图和发情行为体征目测法进行发情检测。在静默发情期间,t0的嗅/舔、举尾、排尿、下巴休息和允许上马的总体平均强度基本上较弱(88.64%),t1组的强度为弱至中等(60.05和34.58%),而t2组的弱、中等和强烈的比例分别为38.5%、27.0%和34.4%。t0组第二次发情的平均发情行为强度为弱至中度(71.875和28.12),t1组发情行为强度主要为弱至中度(42.9%和41.3%),t2组发情基本体征强度主要为中至重度(31.9%和57.7%)。综上所述,通过直接接触加围栏接触的方式对萨希瓦尔小母牛进行生物刺激,其发情行为强度比单独接触围栏更有效。生物刺激和非生物刺激的Sahiwal母牛发情的最突出的主要症状是嗅和舔,排尿,抬起尾巴,允许攀登和下巴休息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of bull exposure on the behavioural intensity of estrus in Sahiwal heifers (Bos Indicus)
The present study was conducted to study the influence of the presence of a bull on the behavioural signs of estrus expressed by Sahiwal heifers. For this experiment, a total of 24 Sahiwal heifers were allotted to 3 groups (T 0 , T 1 and T 2 ) of 8 animals each, based on the age and body weight. In T 0 , the heifers were isolated from the bull; in T 1 group, the heifers were in contact with the bull through a fenceline exposure and in T2 group, the heifers were exposed through a fenceline contact (24 hours) with bull along with direct contact (for 6 hours) through another bull in the heifer shed. Estrus detection was done by bulls in T 1 and T 2 heifers group whereas in T 0 group, heifers heat expectancy chart and visual observation of behavioural signs of estrus was used for estrus detection. Overall mean intensity of sniffing/licking, tail raising, micturition, chin resting and allowing mounting attempts during silent estrus in T 0 was largely weak (88.64%) and in T 1 heifers group, intensity was weak to moderate (60.05 and 34.58 %) whereas, in T 2 group, percentage of weak, moderate and intense was 38.5 %, 27.0 % and 34.4 % respectively. The per cent mean intensity of estrus behaviour in second estrus was weak to moderate (71.875 and 28.12) in T 0 , whereas in T 1 group, intensity was largely weak to moderate (42.9 % and 41.3%) and intensity of cardinal signs of estrus in T 2 was mostly moderate to intense in nature (31.9 % and 57.7%). It can be concluded that bull biostimulation of Sahiwal heifers through direct contact plus fenceline contact was more effective in increasing estrus behaviour intensity as compared to the only fenceline contact. Most prominent cardinal symptoms of estrus in biostimulated as well as non-biostimulated Sahiwal heifers were sniffing and licking, micturition, tail raising, allowing mounting attempts and chin resting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信