《联合国海洋法公约》第76条实施过程中的透明度:透视内部

IF 1.3 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Ocean Development and International Law Pub Date : 2022-08-22 DOI:10.1080/00908320.2022.2105766

Sandrine W. De Herdt

{"title":"《联合国海洋法公约》第76条实施过程中的透明度:透视内部","authors":"Sandrine W. De Herdt","doi":"10.1080/00908320.2022.2105766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The lack of transparency in the work of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf constitutes a major issue for both submitting and third states. In this respect, a careful reader of the reports of UNCLOS Meeting of the States Parties would not fail to discern the constant calls for transparency in the work of this body. While much has already been said on the transparency/confidentiality issues in the work of the Commission, new issues have emerged, such as the question of transparency in the internal relationship between the Commission and its subcommission. Prompted by this observation, this article discusses the process of implementing Article 76 of UNCLOS through the prism of transparency, opacity, and confidentiality, with a particular focus on the instances of disagreements between the subcommission and the Commission in plenary.","PeriodicalId":45771,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Development and International Law","volume":"100 1","pages":"166 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transparency in the Process of Implementing Article 76 of the UNCLOS: Peering Inside\",\"authors\":\"Sandrine W. De Herdt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00908320.2022.2105766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The lack of transparency in the work of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf constitutes a major issue for both submitting and third states. In this respect, a careful reader of the reports of UNCLOS Meeting of the States Parties would not fail to discern the constant calls for transparency in the work of this body. While much has already been said on the transparency/confidentiality issues in the work of the Commission, new issues have emerged, such as the question of transparency in the internal relationship between the Commission and its subcommission. Prompted by this observation, this article discusses the process of implementing Article 76 of UNCLOS through the prism of transparency, opacity, and confidentiality, with a particular focus on the instances of disagreements between the subcommission and the Commission in plenary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean Development and International Law\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"166 - 179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean Development and International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2022.2105766\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Development and International Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2022.2105766","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

大陆架界限委员会的工作缺乏透明度，这对提交国和第三国来说都是一个重大问题。在这方面，仔细阅读《公约》缔约国会议的报告就会发现，人们不断呼吁提高本机构工作的透明度。虽然关于委员会工作中的透明度/保密问题已经说了很多，但是又出现了新的问题，例如委员会与其小组委员会之间内部关系的透明度问题。受此启发，本文从透明、不透明和保密的角度讨论了执行《联合国海洋法公约》第76条的过程，并特别关注小组委员会和委员会在全体会议上的分歧。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Transparency in the Process of Implementing Article 76 of the UNCLOS: Peering Inside

Abstract The lack of transparency in the work of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf constitutes a major issue for both submitting and third states. In this respect, a careful reader of the reports of UNCLOS Meeting of the States Parties would not fail to discern the constant calls for transparency in the work of this body. While much has already been said on the transparency/confidentiality issues in the work of the Commission, new issues have emerged, such as the question of transparency in the internal relationship between the Commission and its subcommission. Prompted by this observation, this article discusses the process of implementing Article 76 of UNCLOS through the prism of transparency, opacity, and confidentiality, with a particular focus on the instances of disagreements between the subcommission and the Commission in plenary.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ocean Development and International Law Multiple-

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Ocean Development and International Law is devoted to all aspects of international and comparative law and policy concerning the management of ocean use and activities. It focuses on the international aspects of ocean regulation, ocean affairs, and all forms of ocean utilization. The journal publishes high quality works of scholarship in such related disciplines as international law of the sea, comparative domestic ocean law, political science, marine economics, geography, shipping, the marine sciences, and ocean engineering and other sea-oriented technologies. Discussions of policy alternatives and factors relevant to policy are emphasized, as are contributions of a theoretical and methodological nature.