机器中的幽灵:情商高的对话代理和未能规范“设计欺骗”

3区 文学 Q3 Arts and Humanities
Pauline M. Kuss, R. Leenes
{"title":"机器中的幽灵:情商高的对话代理和未能规范“设计欺骗”","authors":"Pauline M. Kuss, R. Leenes","doi":"10.2966/scrip.170220.320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Google’s Duplex illustrates the great strides made in AI to provide synthetic agents the capabilities to intuitive and seemingly natural human- machine interaction, fostering a growing acceptance of AI systems as social actors. Following BJ Fogg’s captology framework, we analyse the persuasive and potentially manipulative power of emotionally intelligent conversational agents (EICAs). By definition, human-sounding conversational agents are ‘designed to deceive’. They do so on the basis of vast amounts of information about the individual they are interacting with. We argue that although the current data protection and privacy framework in the EU offers some protection against manipulative conversational agents, the real upcoming issues are not acknowledged in regulation yet.","PeriodicalId":43374,"journal":{"name":"SCRIPTORIUM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ghost in the Machine – Emotionally Intelligent Conversational Agents and the Failure to Regulate ‘Deception by Design’\",\"authors\":\"Pauline M. Kuss, R. Leenes\",\"doi\":\"10.2966/scrip.170220.320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Google’s Duplex illustrates the great strides made in AI to provide synthetic agents the capabilities to intuitive and seemingly natural human- machine interaction, fostering a growing acceptance of AI systems as social actors. Following BJ Fogg’s captology framework, we analyse the persuasive and potentially manipulative power of emotionally intelligent conversational agents (EICAs). By definition, human-sounding conversational agents are ‘designed to deceive’. They do so on the basis of vast amounts of information about the individual they are interacting with. We argue that although the current data protection and privacy framework in the EU offers some protection against manipulative conversational agents, the real upcoming issues are not acknowledged in regulation yet.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SCRIPTORIUM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SCRIPTORIUM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2966/scrip.170220.320\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCRIPTORIUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2966/scrip.170220.320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

谷歌的Duplex展示了人工智能领域取得的巨大进步,为人工智能提供了直觉和看似自然的人机交互能力,促使人们越来越多地接受人工智能系统作为社会参与者。根据BJ Fogg的俘获学框架,我们分析了情商会话代理(eica)的说服力和潜在的操纵能力。根据定义,听起来像人的对话代理是“设计用来欺骗的”。他们这样做是基于与他们互动的个人的大量信息。我们认为,尽管欧盟目前的数据保护和隐私框架提供了一些针对操纵性对话代理的保护,但真正即将到来的问题尚未在监管中得到承认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Ghost in the Machine – Emotionally Intelligent Conversational Agents and the Failure to Regulate ‘Deception by Design’
Google’s Duplex illustrates the great strides made in AI to provide synthetic agents the capabilities to intuitive and seemingly natural human- machine interaction, fostering a growing acceptance of AI systems as social actors. Following BJ Fogg’s captology framework, we analyse the persuasive and potentially manipulative power of emotionally intelligent conversational agents (EICAs). By definition, human-sounding conversational agents are ‘designed to deceive’. They do so on the basis of vast amounts of information about the individual they are interacting with. We argue that although the current data protection and privacy framework in the EU offers some protection against manipulative conversational agents, the real upcoming issues are not acknowledged in regulation yet.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SCRIPTORIUM
SCRIPTORIUM Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信