科学和社会研究内容在线评估的结构:测试一般结果测量的可选格式

IF 0.4 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
P. Mooney, K. McCarter, R. Russo, D. Blackwood
{"title":"科学和社会研究内容在线评估的结构:测试一般结果测量的可选格式","authors":"P. Mooney, K. McCarter, R. Russo, D. Blackwood","doi":"10.15388/sw.2014.28243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research questions addressed the structure of an online form of content-focused general outcome measurement known as critical content monitoring. The assessment tool is designed to serve as an accurate and efficient measure learning performance and progress in science and social studies classes. Scores from single administrations of critical content monitoring probes that varied in content and length were correlated with results from a statewide accountability content test for a sample of American fifth-grade students. The magnitude of correlation was moderate for probes that included a single content (i.e., social studies) or a mix of two subjects (i.e., social studies and science). Comparable correlations were reported for probes that featured reduced time or increased questions. Limitations and research implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":41093,"journal":{"name":"Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The structure of an online assessment of science and social studies content: testing optional formats of a general outcome measure\",\"authors\":\"P. Mooney, K. McCarter, R. Russo, D. Blackwood\",\"doi\":\"10.15388/sw.2014.28243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research questions addressed the structure of an online form of content-focused general outcome measurement known as critical content monitoring. The assessment tool is designed to serve as an accurate and efficient measure learning performance and progress in science and social studies classes. Scores from single administrations of critical content monitoring probes that varied in content and length were correlated with results from a statewide accountability content test for a sample of American fifth-grade students. The magnitude of correlation was moderate for probes that included a single content (i.e., social studies) or a mix of two subjects (i.e., social studies and science). Comparable correlations were reported for probes that featured reduced time or increased questions. Limitations and research implications are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15388/sw.2014.28243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/sw.2014.28243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

研究问题涉及以内容为中心的一般结果测量的在线形式的结构,称为关键内容监测。该评估工具旨在准确有效地衡量科学和社会研究课程的学习表现和进步。在内容和长度上不同的关键内容监测探针的单一管理部门的得分与美国五年级学生样本的全州问责性内容测试的结果相关。对于包含单一内容(即社会研究)或两个科目(即社会研究和科学)的调查,相关程度是中等的。对于以减少时间或增加问题为特征的探针,报告了可比的相关性。讨论了局限性和研究意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The structure of an online assessment of science and social studies content: testing optional formats of a general outcome measure
Research questions addressed the structure of an online form of content-focused general outcome measurement known as critical content monitoring. The assessment tool is designed to serve as an accurate and efficient measure learning performance and progress in science and social studies classes. Scores from single administrations of critical content monitoring probes that varied in content and length were correlated with results from a statewide accountability content test for a sample of American fifth-grade students. The magnitude of correlation was moderate for probes that included a single content (i.e., social studies) or a mix of two subjects (i.e., social studies and science). Comparable correlations were reported for probes that featured reduced time or increased questions. Limitations and research implications are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信