犹太复国主义与政治自由主义:散居民族的自决权

Q1 Social Sciences

Theoretical Inquiries in Law Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.1515/til-2020-0013

Yitzhak Benbaji

{"title":"犹太复国主义与政治自由主义:散居民族的自决权","authors":"Yitzhak Benbaji","doi":"10.1515/til-2020-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This Article offers a defense of egalitarian Zionism that, unlike Chaim Gans’s argument for this view, does not appeal to the Jewish problem in justifying the Zionist requirement for a state with a dominant Jewish community. The argument extracts from the egalitarian principles that underlie John Rawls’s political liberalism, a conception of global justice according to which members of a scattered nation are entitled to a fair opportunity to establish a new state within which they enjoy the advantage of demographic dominance","PeriodicalId":39577,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","volume":"71 1","pages":"229 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zionism and Political Liberalism: The Right of Scattered Nations to Self-Determination\",\"authors\":\"Yitzhak Benbaji\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/til-2020-0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This Article offers a defense of egalitarian Zionism that, unlike Chaim Gans’s argument for this view, does not appeal to the Jewish problem in justifying the Zionist requirement for a state with a dominant Jewish community. The argument extracts from the egalitarian principles that underlie John Rawls’s political liberalism, a conception of global justice according to which members of a scattered nation are entitled to a fair opportunity to establish a new state within which they enjoy the advantage of demographic dominance\",\"PeriodicalId\":39577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical Inquiries in Law\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"229 - 254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical Inquiries in Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2020-0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2020-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本文为平等主义的犹太复国主义提供了辩护。与Chaim Gans的观点不同，平等主义的犹太复国主义在证明犹太复国主义对一个犹太社区占主导地位的国家的要求时，并没有诉诸犹太人的问题。这一论点是从约翰·罗尔斯政治自由主义的基础上提取的平等主义原则，这是一个全球正义的概念，根据这个概念，一个分散的国家的成员有权有公平的机会建立一个新的国家，在这个国家里，他们享有人口优势

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Zionism and Political Liberalism: The Right of Scattered Nations to Self-Determination

Abstract This Article offers a defense of egalitarian Zionism that, unlike Chaim Gans’s argument for this view, does not appeal to the Jewish problem in justifying the Zionist requirement for a state with a dominant Jewish community. The argument extracts from the egalitarian principles that underlie John Rawls’s political liberalism, a conception of global justice according to which members of a scattered nation are entitled to a fair opportunity to establish a new state within which they enjoy the advantage of demographic dominance

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Theoretical Inquiries in Law Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Theoretical Inquiries in Law is devoted to the application to legal thought of insights developed by diverse disciplines such as philosophy, sociology, economics, history and psychology. The range of legal issues dealt with by the journal is virtually unlimited, subject only to the journal''s commitment to cross-disciplinary fertilization of ideas. We strive to provide a forum for all those interested in looking at law from more than a single theoretical perspective and who share our view that only a multi-disciplinary analysis can provide a comprehensive account of the complex interrelationships between law, society and individuals