发展政策知识:土著人民对公共政策中土地权利话语的认识研究

T. Setiawan
{"title":"发展政策知识:土著人民对公共政策中土地权利话语的认识研究","authors":"T. Setiawan","doi":"10.31845/JWK.V24I1.669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the major themes in contemporary public policy studies is to making public policy based on or based on science by relying on various research results. Knowledgee is continually being discourses through a set of studies until finally it can be used as a basis for making good public policy. This paper aims to analyze the land tenure struggle within the public policy in the context of developing knowledge for policy after New Order Era. Conceptually the tenure discourse is understood as a recognition by the state over the rights of indigenous people land that essentially becomes a reflection of the willingness the state power bearers to recognize the existence of autonomous indigenous peoples. The method used in this paper is qualitative method, with research technique of literature study and document analysis, and also participatory observation. In conclusion, the agenda to recognize community rights over land and other natural resources should be formulated with new provisions and / or use of the old provisions, which maintain harmony between people who are de facto entitled to land and natural resources, with government authorities on the basis of the political conception of the state property rights, contained in the law on land and natural resources.","PeriodicalId":33785,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Wacana Kinerja","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DEVELOPING KNOWLEDGE TO POLICY: STUDY ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLE'S RECOGNITION OF LAND RIGHTS DISCOURSE IN PUBLIC POLICY\",\"authors\":\"T. Setiawan\",\"doi\":\"10.31845/JWK.V24I1.669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the major themes in contemporary public policy studies is to making public policy based on or based on science by relying on various research results. Knowledgee is continually being discourses through a set of studies until finally it can be used as a basis for making good public policy. This paper aims to analyze the land tenure struggle within the public policy in the context of developing knowledge for policy after New Order Era. Conceptually the tenure discourse is understood as a recognition by the state over the rights of indigenous people land that essentially becomes a reflection of the willingness the state power bearers to recognize the existence of autonomous indigenous peoples. The method used in this paper is qualitative method, with research technique of literature study and document analysis, and also participatory observation. In conclusion, the agenda to recognize community rights over land and other natural resources should be formulated with new provisions and / or use of the old provisions, which maintain harmony between people who are de facto entitled to land and natural resources, with government authorities on the basis of the political conception of the state property rights, contained in the law on land and natural resources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Wacana Kinerja\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Wacana Kinerja\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31845/JWK.V24I1.669\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Wacana Kinerja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31845/JWK.V24I1.669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当代公共政策研究的一大主题是依靠各种研究成果,以科学为基础或以科学为基础制定公共政策。通过一系列的研究,知识不断地被讨论,直到最后它可以被用作制定良好公共政策的基础。本文旨在分析新秩序时代后公共政策背景下的土地权属斗争。从概念上讲,权属话语被理解为国家对土著人民土地权利的承认,这本质上反映了国家权力持有者承认自治土著人民存在的意愿。本文采用定性研究方法,采用文献研究法和文献分析法的研究方法,并结合参与式观察。总之,承认对土地和其他自然资源的社区权利的议程应该制定新的条款和/或使用旧的条款,这些条款在土地和自然资源法律中包含的国家产权的政治概念的基础上,保持事实上有权拥有土地和自然资源的人与政府当局之间的和谐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DEVELOPING KNOWLEDGE TO POLICY: STUDY ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLE'S RECOGNITION OF LAND RIGHTS DISCOURSE IN PUBLIC POLICY
One of the major themes in contemporary public policy studies is to making public policy based on or based on science by relying on various research results. Knowledgee is continually being discourses through a set of studies until finally it can be used as a basis for making good public policy. This paper aims to analyze the land tenure struggle within the public policy in the context of developing knowledge for policy after New Order Era. Conceptually the tenure discourse is understood as a recognition by the state over the rights of indigenous people land that essentially becomes a reflection of the willingness the state power bearers to recognize the existence of autonomous indigenous peoples. The method used in this paper is qualitative method, with research technique of literature study and document analysis, and also participatory observation. In conclusion, the agenda to recognize community rights over land and other natural resources should be formulated with new provisions and / or use of the old provisions, which maintain harmony between people who are de facto entitled to land and natural resources, with government authorities on the basis of the political conception of the state property rights, contained in the law on land and natural resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信