印度裔美国人与南亚裔美国人倡导组织:美国散居的政治激进主义

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Prema A. Kurien
{"title":"印度裔美国人与南亚裔美国人倡导组织:美国散居的政治激进主义","authors":"Prema A. Kurien","doi":"10.1080/19438192.2021.2010168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Why do some diasporic activists gravitate towards ethnic organisations while others mobilise around a panethnic paradigm, and what difference does this make for patterns of activism? A prominent division among secular activists of Indian American background is that some individuals prefer to mobilise as ‘Indian Americans’ while others are active as ‘South Asian Americans.’ There are fundamental differences in the strategies, goals, and broader alliance patterns of these two types of advocacy organisations. This article argues that this is because each type of organisation is responding to specific frameworks and incentives for mobilisation within the U.S. landscape with immigrant leaders rallying around Indian American organisations focused on foreign policy, while second generation activists mobilise around South Asian American organisations focused on domestic policy, particularly racism and civil rights. It makes an important contribution by showing how generational difference can shape the goals and strategies of advocacy organisations.","PeriodicalId":42548,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Diaspora","volume":"10 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indian American versus South Asian American advocacy organisations: diasporic political activism in the U.S.\",\"authors\":\"Prema A. Kurien\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19438192.2021.2010168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Why do some diasporic activists gravitate towards ethnic organisations while others mobilise around a panethnic paradigm, and what difference does this make for patterns of activism? A prominent division among secular activists of Indian American background is that some individuals prefer to mobilise as ‘Indian Americans’ while others are active as ‘South Asian Americans.’ There are fundamental differences in the strategies, goals, and broader alliance patterns of these two types of advocacy organisations. This article argues that this is because each type of organisation is responding to specific frameworks and incentives for mobilisation within the U.S. landscape with immigrant leaders rallying around Indian American organisations focused on foreign policy, while second generation activists mobilise around South Asian American organisations focused on domestic policy, particularly racism and civil rights. It makes an important contribution by showing how generational difference can shape the goals and strategies of advocacy organisations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Asian Diaspora\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Asian Diaspora\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19438192.2021.2010168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Diaspora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19438192.2021.2010168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为什么一些散居的活动家倾向于民族组织,而另一些则围绕泛民族范式动员,这对行动主义的模式有什么不同?印度裔美国人背景的世俗活动家之间的一个显著分歧是,一些人更喜欢以“印度裔美国人”的身份动员起来,而另一些人则以“南亚裔美国人”的身份活跃起来。这两类倡导组织在策略、目标和更广泛的联盟模式上存在根本差异。这篇文章认为,这是因为每种类型的组织都对美国境内动员的特定框架和激励措施做出了回应,移民领导人团结在专注于外交政策的印度裔美国人组织周围,而第二代活动家则围绕专注于国内政策的南亚裔美国人组织进行动员,特别是种族主义和民权。它通过展示代际差异如何影响倡导组织的目标和策略做出了重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indian American versus South Asian American advocacy organisations: diasporic political activism in the U.S.
ABSTRACT Why do some diasporic activists gravitate towards ethnic organisations while others mobilise around a panethnic paradigm, and what difference does this make for patterns of activism? A prominent division among secular activists of Indian American background is that some individuals prefer to mobilise as ‘Indian Americans’ while others are active as ‘South Asian Americans.’ There are fundamental differences in the strategies, goals, and broader alliance patterns of these two types of advocacy organisations. This article argues that this is because each type of organisation is responding to specific frameworks and incentives for mobilisation within the U.S. landscape with immigrant leaders rallying around Indian American organisations focused on foreign policy, while second generation activists mobilise around South Asian American organisations focused on domestic policy, particularly racism and civil rights. It makes an important contribution by showing how generational difference can shape the goals and strategies of advocacy organisations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South Asian Diaspora
South Asian Diaspora AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信