从不情愿到接受:基于话语制度主义的贫困人口参与政策实施

Wawan Edi Kuswandoro
{"title":"从不情愿到接受:基于话语制度主义的贫困人口参与政策实施","authors":"Wawan Edi Kuswandoro","doi":"10.21776/ub.transformative.2023.009.01.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The poor-people reluctance in participation in government’s policy implementation was caused by by the distance of government policy discourse and poor-people discourse. This article investigates policy implementation of sanitation program in Probolinggo City, East Java using Discursive Institutionalism perspective and Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis method to discover hidden meanings of the multi-actor’s discourse. The research found, first, the reluctance of poor-people participation in policy implementation was caused by negative discourse on sanitation interpellated the poor-people. Second, acceptation for the program implemented was achieved by narrowing the gap of discourse through penetration of alternative discourse constructed under policy design. Third, policy implementor’s discourse was exercised by breaking personal discourse of the people. Forth, discursive strategy changed personal discourse of society which then shifts reluctance to acceptance for government programs. Fifth, policy design for activating urban poor-people’s participation as social engineering based on discourse and discursive strategy.","PeriodicalId":33193,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Transformative","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Reluctance to Acceptation: Participation of Poor-People in Policy Implementation Using Discursive Institutionalism\",\"authors\":\"Wawan Edi Kuswandoro\",\"doi\":\"10.21776/ub.transformative.2023.009.01.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The poor-people reluctance in participation in government’s policy implementation was caused by by the distance of government policy discourse and poor-people discourse. This article investigates policy implementation of sanitation program in Probolinggo City, East Java using Discursive Institutionalism perspective and Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis method to discover hidden meanings of the multi-actor’s discourse. The research found, first, the reluctance of poor-people participation in policy implementation was caused by negative discourse on sanitation interpellated the poor-people. Second, acceptation for the program implemented was achieved by narrowing the gap of discourse through penetration of alternative discourse constructed under policy design. Third, policy implementor’s discourse was exercised by breaking personal discourse of the people. Forth, discursive strategy changed personal discourse of society which then shifts reluctance to acceptance for government programs. Fifth, policy design for activating urban poor-people’s participation as social engineering based on discourse and discursive strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Transformative\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Transformative\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.transformative.2023.009.01.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Transformative","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.transformative.2023.009.01.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

穷人不愿意参与政府的政策执行是由政府政策话语与穷人话语的距离造成的。本文运用话语制度主义视角和费尔克劳的批判话语分析方法,对东爪哇Probolinggo市卫生项目的政策实施进行了调查,以发现多行动者话语的隐含意义。研究发现,首先,贫困人口不愿参与政策实施的原因是贫困人口对卫生问题的负面论述。第二,通过对政策设计下建构的替代话语的渗透,缩小话语的差距,实现了对实施方案的接受。第三,政策执行者话语的行使打破了人民的个人话语。第四,话语策略改变了个人对社会的话语,从而将不情愿转变为对政府计划的接受。第五,基于话语和话语策略的社会工程——激活城市贫困人口参与的政策设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Reluctance to Acceptation: Participation of Poor-People in Policy Implementation Using Discursive Institutionalism
The poor-people reluctance in participation in government’s policy implementation was caused by by the distance of government policy discourse and poor-people discourse. This article investigates policy implementation of sanitation program in Probolinggo City, East Java using Discursive Institutionalism perspective and Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis method to discover hidden meanings of the multi-actor’s discourse. The research found, first, the reluctance of poor-people participation in policy implementation was caused by negative discourse on sanitation interpellated the poor-people. Second, acceptation for the program implemented was achieved by narrowing the gap of discourse through penetration of alternative discourse constructed under policy design. Third, policy implementor’s discourse was exercised by breaking personal discourse of the people. Forth, discursive strategy changed personal discourse of society which then shifts reluctance to acceptance for government programs. Fifth, policy design for activating urban poor-people’s participation as social engineering based on discourse and discursive strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信