{"title":"建筑个性与审美偏好:研究途径与评价方法述评。","authors":"Mohsen Dehghani Tafti, Masoud Ahmadzad-Asl, Mehrnaz Fallah Tafti, Gholamhossein Memarian, Sarvenaz Soltani, Farhang Mozaffar","doi":"10.32598/bcn.2021.3257.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A clear relationship exists between human personality and architectural preferences. However, reviewing the findings of previous studies reveals that this expectation is not necessarily accurate, as contradictory results have been reported. This study aims to review various research and assessment methods used in previous studies for assessing the relationship between personality and architectural preferences and identify the theoretical and practical shortcomings of each method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a critical review study. A search was conducted in Google Scholar and Web of Science database for published articles in English using the following keywords: \"Visual aesthetics,\" \"personality traits,\" \"architectural preferences,\" \"art preferences,\" and \"aesthetic judgments.\" These articles were first categorized into four groups based on their methodological approaches (physiological, neurobiological, practical, and psychological) and then their degree of success and generalizability were assessed briefly. Finally, due to having lower implementation limitations and a higher theoretical background, the group using the psychological approaches was structurally analyzed from the methodological and practical aspects to develop a conceptual quadruple model. After presenting the model, neural network modeling was used to discover of hidden patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the analysis of the reviewed studies, the psychological approach was a more feasible option for assessing the relationship between personality and architectural preferences. The quadruple model that proposed for this purpose included <b>aesthetic variables/environm</b>ental stimuli, context, personality traits, and responses. The machine learning method facilitated the discovery of hidden patterns in relationship between personality and human preferences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study proposes a new systematic quadruple model for evaluating aesthetic preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":8728,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12248176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality and Aesthetic Preferences in Architecture: A Review of the Study Approaches and Assessment Methods.\",\"authors\":\"Mohsen Dehghani Tafti, Masoud Ahmadzad-Asl, Mehrnaz Fallah Tafti, Gholamhossein Memarian, Sarvenaz Soltani, Farhang Mozaffar\",\"doi\":\"10.32598/bcn.2021.3257.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A clear relationship exists between human personality and architectural preferences. However, reviewing the findings of previous studies reveals that this expectation is not necessarily accurate, as contradictory results have been reported. This study aims to review various research and assessment methods used in previous studies for assessing the relationship between personality and architectural preferences and identify the theoretical and practical shortcomings of each method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a critical review study. A search was conducted in Google Scholar and Web of Science database for published articles in English using the following keywords: \\\"Visual aesthetics,\\\" \\\"personality traits,\\\" \\\"architectural preferences,\\\" \\\"art preferences,\\\" and \\\"aesthetic judgments.\\\" These articles were first categorized into four groups based on their methodological approaches (physiological, neurobiological, practical, and psychological) and then their degree of success and generalizability were assessed briefly. Finally, due to having lower implementation limitations and a higher theoretical background, the group using the psychological approaches was structurally analyzed from the methodological and practical aspects to develop a conceptual quadruple model. After presenting the model, neural network modeling was used to discover of hidden patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the analysis of the reviewed studies, the psychological approach was a more feasible option for assessing the relationship between personality and architectural preferences. The quadruple model that proposed for this purpose included <b>aesthetic variables/environm</b>ental stimuli, context, personality traits, and responses. The machine learning method facilitated the discovery of hidden patterns in relationship between personality and human preferences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study proposes a new systematic quadruple model for evaluating aesthetic preferences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12248176/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2021.3257.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2021.3257.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
引言:人的个性和建筑偏好之间存在着明确的关系。然而,回顾以往的研究发现,这种期望并不一定准确,因为已经报道了相互矛盾的结果。本研究旨在回顾以往研究中用于评估个性与建筑偏好之间关系的各种研究和评估方法,并找出每种方法在理论和实践中的不足之处。方法:这是一项批判性的综述性研究。在谷歌Scholar和Web of Science数据库中搜索已发表的英文文章,使用以下关键词:“视觉美学”、“个性特征”、“建筑偏好”、“艺术偏好”和“审美判断”。首先根据研究方法(生理学、神经生物学、实践性和心理学)将这些文章分为四组,然后对其成功程度和可推广性进行简要评估。最后,由于实施限制较低,理论背景较高,从方法论和实践两个方面对使用心理学方法的群体进行了结构分析,建立了概念四重模型。在给出模型后,利用神经网络建模来发现隐藏模式。结果:基于对已有研究的分析,心理学方法是评估个性与建筑偏好之间关系的更可行的选择。为此目的提出的四重模型包括审美变量/环境刺激、背景、人格特征和反应。机器学习方法有助于发现人格和人类偏好之间的隐藏模式。结论:本研究提出了一种新的系统的审美偏好评价四重模型。
Personality and Aesthetic Preferences in Architecture: A Review of the Study Approaches and Assessment Methods.
Introduction: A clear relationship exists between human personality and architectural preferences. However, reviewing the findings of previous studies reveals that this expectation is not necessarily accurate, as contradictory results have been reported. This study aims to review various research and assessment methods used in previous studies for assessing the relationship between personality and architectural preferences and identify the theoretical and practical shortcomings of each method.
Methods: This is a critical review study. A search was conducted in Google Scholar and Web of Science database for published articles in English using the following keywords: "Visual aesthetics," "personality traits," "architectural preferences," "art preferences," and "aesthetic judgments." These articles were first categorized into four groups based on their methodological approaches (physiological, neurobiological, practical, and psychological) and then their degree of success and generalizability were assessed briefly. Finally, due to having lower implementation limitations and a higher theoretical background, the group using the psychological approaches was structurally analyzed from the methodological and practical aspects to develop a conceptual quadruple model. After presenting the model, neural network modeling was used to discover of hidden patterns.
Results: Based on the analysis of the reviewed studies, the psychological approach was a more feasible option for assessing the relationship between personality and architectural preferences. The quadruple model that proposed for this purpose included aesthetic variables/environmental stimuli, context, personality traits, and responses. The machine learning method facilitated the discovery of hidden patterns in relationship between personality and human preferences.
Conclusion: This study proposes a new systematic quadruple model for evaluating aesthetic preferences.