{"title":"调和产出与失业财政乘数","authors":"Tae Bong Kim","doi":"10.1080/1226508X.2019.1605922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper provides a macroeconomic model that can simultaneously explain output and unemployment multipliers which are consistent with empirical evidence. To this end, this paper has merged and investigated a model with deep habit formation in private and public consumptions and a model with a labour market friction that generates involuntary unemployment stemming from the monopolistic power of differentiated labour services. The model with a baseline calibration seems to produce quantitatively plausible responses of key macroeconomic variables in response to a government expenditure shock.","PeriodicalId":45235,"journal":{"name":"Global Economic Review","volume":"397 1","pages":"378 - 395"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconciling Output and Unemployment Fiscal Multipliers\",\"authors\":\"Tae Bong Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1226508X.2019.1605922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper provides a macroeconomic model that can simultaneously explain output and unemployment multipliers which are consistent with empirical evidence. To this end, this paper has merged and investigated a model with deep habit formation in private and public consumptions and a model with a labour market friction that generates involuntary unemployment stemming from the monopolistic power of differentiated labour services. The model with a baseline calibration seems to produce quantitatively plausible responses of key macroeconomic variables in response to a government expenditure shock.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Economic Review\",\"volume\":\"397 1\",\"pages\":\"378 - 395\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2019.1605922\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2019.1605922","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reconciling Output and Unemployment Fiscal Multipliers
ABSTRACT This paper provides a macroeconomic model that can simultaneously explain output and unemployment multipliers which are consistent with empirical evidence. To this end, this paper has merged and investigated a model with deep habit formation in private and public consumptions and a model with a labour market friction that generates involuntary unemployment stemming from the monopolistic power of differentiated labour services. The model with a baseline calibration seems to produce quantitatively plausible responses of key macroeconomic variables in response to a government expenditure shock.