拜占庭人和萨拉丁:一些进一步的争论

IF 0.3 2区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
Savvas Neocleous
{"title":"拜占庭人和萨拉丁:一些进一步的争论","authors":"Savvas Neocleous","doi":"10.1080/09503110.2013.799952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract This is the second of two articles by the same author arguing against the thesis that there was a conspiracy between the Byzantine emperors and Saladin, sultan of Egypt and Syria, against the crusader states and the Third Crusade in the 1180s. While the focus of the first article was primarily on the Latin sources, the present study shifts the focus to the Arabic primary material, hitherto largely neglected or inadequately treated by modern historians. Through a critical re-examination and re-interpretation of the Arabic sources, backed by the introduction and discussion of new Latin material when necessary, this article presents expanded arguments on the relations between the Byzantine Empire, the Sultanate of Konya and Saladin in the 1180s. The conclusions lend further support to the view that the Byzantine rulers and Saladin never concluded an alliance against the Latin settlers of Outremer and the Third Crusade.","PeriodicalId":42974,"journal":{"name":"Al-Masaq-Journal of the Medieval Mediterranean","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Byzantines and Saladin: Some Further Arguments\",\"authors\":\"Savvas Neocleous\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09503110.2013.799952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract This is the second of two articles by the same author arguing against the thesis that there was a conspiracy between the Byzantine emperors and Saladin, sultan of Egypt and Syria, against the crusader states and the Third Crusade in the 1180s. While the focus of the first article was primarily on the Latin sources, the present study shifts the focus to the Arabic primary material, hitherto largely neglected or inadequately treated by modern historians. Through a critical re-examination and re-interpretation of the Arabic sources, backed by the introduction and discussion of new Latin material when necessary, this article presents expanded arguments on the relations between the Byzantine Empire, the Sultanate of Konya and Saladin in the 1180s. The conclusions lend further support to the view that the Byzantine rulers and Saladin never concluded an alliance against the Latin settlers of Outremer and the Third Crusade.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Masaq-Journal of the Medieval Mediterranean\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Masaq-Journal of the Medieval Mediterranean\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09503110.2013.799952\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Masaq-Journal of the Medieval Mediterranean","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09503110.2013.799952","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

这是同一作者的两篇文章中的第二篇,该文章反对拜占庭皇帝与埃及和叙利亚苏丹萨拉丁之间存在反对十字军国家和11世纪80年代第三次十字军东征的阴谋。虽然第一篇文章的重点主要是拉丁来源,但目前的研究将重点转移到阿拉伯语的原始材料上,迄今为止,这些材料在很大程度上被现代历史学家忽视或没有得到充分的处理。通过对阿拉伯语资料的批判性重新审视和重新解释,并在必要时引入和讨论新的拉丁材料,本文对1180年代拜占庭帝国、科尼亚苏丹国和萨拉丁之间的关系进行了扩展论证。这些结论进一步支持了这样一种观点,即拜占庭统治者和萨拉丁从未结成联盟,反对奥特雷默的拉丁定居者和第三次十字军东征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Byzantines and Saladin: Some Further Arguments
abstract This is the second of two articles by the same author arguing against the thesis that there was a conspiracy between the Byzantine emperors and Saladin, sultan of Egypt and Syria, against the crusader states and the Third Crusade in the 1180s. While the focus of the first article was primarily on the Latin sources, the present study shifts the focus to the Arabic primary material, hitherto largely neglected or inadequately treated by modern historians. Through a critical re-examination and re-interpretation of the Arabic sources, backed by the introduction and discussion of new Latin material when necessary, this article presents expanded arguments on the relations between the Byzantine Empire, the Sultanate of Konya and Saladin in the 1180s. The conclusions lend further support to the view that the Byzantine rulers and Saladin never concluded an alliance against the Latin settlers of Outremer and the Third Crusade.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Al-Masaq-Journal of the Medieval Mediterranean
Al-Masaq-Journal of the Medieval Mediterranean MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信