圣战萨拉菲斯特如何在危机、身份和解决方案框架中有时违反，但主要是规避Facebook的社区标准

IF 1.2 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Studies in Conflict & Terrorism Pub Date : 2021-08-16 DOI:10.1080/1057610x.2021.1963092

Catherine Bouko, Pieter Van Ostaeyen, Pierre Voué

引用次数: 1

摘要

我们分析了不支持任何恐怖组织，却鼓吹暴力圣战的Facebook个人资料上的帖子。他们在常规帖子中分享极端主义内容，因此他们…

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

How Jihadi Salafists Sometimes Breach, But Mostly Circumvent, Facebook’s Community Standards in Crisis, Identity and Solution Frames

We analyzed posts written by Facebook profiles who advocate violent jihad without supporting any terrorist group. They share extremist content in the middle of regular posts, thanks to which they a...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Studies in Conflict & Terrorism Multiple-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Terrorism and insurgency are now the dominant forms of conflict in the world today. Fuelled by moribund peace processes, ethnic and religious strife, disputes over natural resources, and transnational organized crime, these longstanding security challenges have become even more violent and intractable: posing new threats to international peace and stability. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism aims to cast new light on the origins and implications of conflict in the 21st Century and to illuminate new approaches and solutions to countering the growth and escalation of contemporary sub-state violence.