这是一个没有用武之地，是有意无意地侵犯西塞罗的文字

IF 0.1 3区历史学 0 CLASSICS

PHILOLOGUS Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1515/phil-2022-0109

H. Weidemann

{"title":"这是一个没有用武之地，是有意无意地侵犯西塞罗的文字","authors":"H. Weidemann","doi":"10.1515/phil-2022-0109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the present article, proposed corrections to two passages of Cicero’s treatise De fato are examined. It is shown that, on the one hand, a widely accepted correction for §27 that replaces the well attested reading vera fuerunt instantia ... vera erunt instantia with vera fuerit instantia ... vera erit instantia is unnecessary, and that, on the other hand, my recently suggested correction for §48, which replaces the obviously false reading Nam si atomis ..., illud quoque ... with Aut num, si atomis ..., illud quoque ...?, is deficient and should be improved to Nam si atomis ..., num illud quoque ...?","PeriodicalId":44663,"journal":{"name":"PHILOLOGUS","volume":"15 1","pages":"45 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ein überflüssiger und ein nur ansatzweise richtiger Eingriff in den überlieferten Text von Ciceros Schrift De fato\",\"authors\":\"H. Weidemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/phil-2022-0109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In the present article, proposed corrections to two passages of Cicero’s treatise De fato are examined. It is shown that, on the one hand, a widely accepted correction for §27 that replaces the well attested reading vera fuerunt instantia ... vera erunt instantia with vera fuerit instantia ... vera erit instantia is unnecessary, and that, on the other hand, my recently suggested correction for §48, which replaces the obviously false reading Nam si atomis ..., illud quoque ... with Aut num, si atomis ..., illud quoque ...?, is deficient and should be improved to Nam si atomis ..., num illud quoque ...?\",\"PeriodicalId\":44663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHILOLOGUS\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"45 - 62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHILOLOGUS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2022-0109\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOLOGUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2022-0109","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要在本文中，提出了对西塞罗的论文De fato的两个段落的修正。结果表明，一方面，对§27的广泛接受的更正取代了得到充分证明的阅读vera fuerunt instantia…Vera erunt瞬间与Vera fuerit瞬间…vera erit instantia是不必要的，另一方面，我最近建议对§48进行更正，它取代了明显错误的Nam si atomis…，我想……有1个原子，6个原子…? ?，是有缺陷的，应该改进到南丝原子…我想问一下……

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Ein überflüssiger und ein nur ansatzweise richtiger Eingriff in den überlieferten Text von Ciceros Schrift De fato

Abstract In the present article, proposed corrections to two passages of Cicero’s treatise De fato are examined. It is shown that, on the one hand, a widely accepted correction for §27 that replaces the well attested reading vera fuerunt instantia ... vera erunt instantia with vera fuerit instantia ... vera erit instantia is unnecessary, and that, on the other hand, my recently suggested correction for §48, which replaces the obviously false reading Nam si atomis ..., illud quoque ... with Aut num, si atomis ..., illud quoque ...?, is deficient and should be improved to Nam si atomis ..., num illud quoque ...?

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

PHILOLOGUS CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Die Beiträge behandeln Probleme der griechischen und lateinischen Literatur, Geschichtsschreibung, Philosophie, Religionsgeschichte und Linguistik sowie ihrer Rezeption und der Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Ziel der Zeitschrift ist es, einen Beitrag zur Erhellung der geistigen Kultur der Antike und ihrer Wirkungsgeschichte zu leisten. "Philologus" is one of the oldest and most respected periodicals in the field of classical studies. Its articles investigate Greek and Roman literature, historiography, philosophy, history of religion, linguistics, and history of science. The journal contributes to reconstructing and understanding ancient intellectual culture and its lasting influence on European civilization.