刑罚目的的变迁:上个世纪的回顾与下一个世纪的思考

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
A. Alschuler
{"title":"刑罚目的的变迁:上个世纪的回顾与下一个世纪的思考","authors":"A. Alschuler","doi":"10.2307/1600541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discussions of the textbook purposes of criminal punishmentretribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation' sometimes seem too abstract to matter. This Essay, however, examines two unmistakably consequential shifts in the stated objectives of punishment. It describes America's turn to rehabilitative goals early in the twentieth century, the persistence of these goals through most of the century, and the demise of rehabilitation and emergence of a \"new penology\" in the century's final quarter. It contends that both American revolutions in penal objectives were mistaken. Retribution, the purpose of punishment most disparaged from the beginning of the century through the end, merits recognition as the criminal law's central objective.","PeriodicalId":51436,"journal":{"name":"University of Chicago Law Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Changing Purposes of Criminal Punishment: A Retrospective on the past Century and Some Thoughts about the Next\",\"authors\":\"A. Alschuler\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1600541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Discussions of the textbook purposes of criminal punishmentretribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation' sometimes seem too abstract to matter. This Essay, however, examines two unmistakably consequential shifts in the stated objectives of punishment. It describes America's turn to rehabilitative goals early in the twentieth century, the persistence of these goals through most of the century, and the demise of rehabilitation and emergence of a \\\"new penology\\\" in the century's final quarter. It contends that both American revolutions in penal objectives were mistaken. Retribution, the purpose of punishment most disparaged from the beginning of the century through the end, merits recognition as the criminal law's central objective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Chicago Law Review\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Chicago Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1600541\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Chicago Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1600541","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

教科书上关于刑事惩罚目的的讨论——报复、威慑、丧失行为能力和改造——有时似乎过于抽象而无关紧要。这篇文章,然而,检查两个明确无误的后果转变,在既定的惩罚目标。它描述了美国在20世纪初转向康复目标,在20世纪的大部分时间里坚持这些目标,以及在20世纪最后25年康复的消亡和“新刑罚学”的出现。它认为,美国两次革命的刑罚目标都是错误的。惩罚的目的,从本世纪初到本世纪末最受轻视的,值得承认为刑法的中心目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Changing Purposes of Criminal Punishment: A Retrospective on the past Century and Some Thoughts about the Next
Discussions of the textbook purposes of criminal punishmentretribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation' sometimes seem too abstract to matter. This Essay, however, examines two unmistakably consequential shifts in the stated objectives of punishment. It describes America's turn to rehabilitative goals early in the twentieth century, the persistence of these goals through most of the century, and the demise of rehabilitation and emergence of a "new penology" in the century's final quarter. It contends that both American revolutions in penal objectives were mistaken. Retribution, the purpose of punishment most disparaged from the beginning of the century through the end, merits recognition as the criminal law's central objective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The University of Chicago Law Review is a quarterly journal of legal scholarship. Often cited in Supreme Court and other court opinions, as well as in other scholarly works, it is among the most influential journals in the field. Students have full responsibility for editing and publishing the Law Review; they also contribute original scholarship of their own. The Law Review"s editorial board selects all pieces for publication and, with the assistance of staff members, performs substantive and technical edits on each of these pieces prior to publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信