A. Khalifeh, Haya Salah, S. Alouneh, Anwar Al-Assaf, Khalid A. Darabkh
{"title":"DigiMesh和ZigBee无线网状网络的性能评估","authors":"A. Khalifeh, Haya Salah, S. Alouneh, Anwar Al-Assaf, Khalid A. Darabkh","doi":"10.1109/WISPNET.2018.8538620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an experimental evaluation of ZigBee and DigiMesh networks; a two well-known and widely used Wireless Mesh Networks architectures. The performance metrics used were the throughput, Round Trip Time, Received Signal Strength Indication, and Mesh Routing Recovery Time. The conducted experiments show that DigiMesh have better throughput than ZigBeee networks. However, the later outperforms DigiMesh based networks by having lower Round Trip Time, higher Received Signal Strength Indication, and it needs less time to recover from a failure node. These features make ZigBee a better choice for applications that require less delay and need longer communication range, while DigiMesh based networks are better used for networks with high throughput requirements.","PeriodicalId":6858,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET)","volume":"51 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of DigiMesh and ZigBee Wireless Mesh Networks\",\"authors\":\"A. Khalifeh, Haya Salah, S. Alouneh, Anwar Al-Assaf, Khalid A. Darabkh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WISPNET.2018.8538620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents an experimental evaluation of ZigBee and DigiMesh networks; a two well-known and widely used Wireless Mesh Networks architectures. The performance metrics used were the throughput, Round Trip Time, Received Signal Strength Indication, and Mesh Routing Recovery Time. The conducted experiments show that DigiMesh have better throughput than ZigBeee networks. However, the later outperforms DigiMesh based networks by having lower Round Trip Time, higher Received Signal Strength Indication, and it needs less time to recover from a failure node. These features make ZigBee a better choice for applications that require less delay and need longer communication range, while DigiMesh based networks are better used for networks with high throughput requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET)\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WISPNET.2018.8538620\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WISPNET.2018.8538620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance Evaluation of DigiMesh and ZigBee Wireless Mesh Networks
This paper presents an experimental evaluation of ZigBee and DigiMesh networks; a two well-known and widely used Wireless Mesh Networks architectures. The performance metrics used were the throughput, Round Trip Time, Received Signal Strength Indication, and Mesh Routing Recovery Time. The conducted experiments show that DigiMesh have better throughput than ZigBeee networks. However, the later outperforms DigiMesh based networks by having lower Round Trip Time, higher Received Signal Strength Indication, and it needs less time to recover from a failure node. These features make ZigBee a better choice for applications that require less delay and need longer communication range, while DigiMesh based networks are better used for networks with high throughput requirements.