当国际商事仲裁与中国的制裁法相遇:共存却又分离?

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW
Beibei Zhang, W. Shen
{"title":"当国际商事仲裁与中国的制裁法相遇:共存却又分离?","authors":"Beibei Zhang, W. Shen","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idac024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the light of China’s newly installed sanction laws recently being considered by Chinese court in a judicial review procedure for an arbitral award, this article examines two aspects of these laws that have been largely overlooked by previous research: their private international law nature and the impact they have on the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. In their function, the Chinese sanction laws should neither fulfil the role of rules established to utilize private persons to implement Chinese state policy, nor, in their application, contradict China’s claimed role in the international legal and political framework. Accordingly, two routes are offered as to how these laws should be applied: first, the legal restrains on private enforcement of the sanction laws should be made available; and secondly, China should ensure that its sanction laws do not compromise the New York Convention’s remit.","PeriodicalId":44660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When International Commercial Arbitration meets China’s sanction laws: living together but remaining apart?\",\"authors\":\"Beibei Zhang, W. Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnlids/idac024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In the light of China’s newly installed sanction laws recently being considered by Chinese court in a judicial review procedure for an arbitral award, this article examines two aspects of these laws that have been largely overlooked by previous research: their private international law nature and the impact they have on the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. In their function, the Chinese sanction laws should neither fulfil the role of rules established to utilize private persons to implement Chinese state policy, nor, in their application, contradict China’s claimed role in the international legal and political framework. Accordingly, two routes are offered as to how these laws should be applied: first, the legal restrains on private enforcement of the sanction laws should be made available; and secondly, China should ensure that its sanction laws do not compromise the New York Convention’s remit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Dispute Settlement\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Dispute Settlement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idac024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idac024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于中国法院最近在仲裁裁决的司法审查程序中审议了中国新实施的制裁法律,本文考察了这些法律在很大程度上被以往研究忽视的两个方面:它们的国际私法性质以及它们对外国仲裁裁决执行的影响。就其功能而言,中国的制裁法律既不应履行为利用私人实施中国国家政策而制定的规则的作用,也不应在其适用中违背中国在国际法律和政治框架中所声称的角色。因此,就如何适用这些法律提出了两条途径:第一,对制裁法律的私人执行提供法律限制;其次,中国应确保其制裁法律不损害《纽约公约》的职权范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When International Commercial Arbitration meets China’s sanction laws: living together but remaining apart?
In the light of China’s newly installed sanction laws recently being considered by Chinese court in a judicial review procedure for an arbitral award, this article examines two aspects of these laws that have been largely overlooked by previous research: their private international law nature and the impact they have on the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. In their function, the Chinese sanction laws should neither fulfil the role of rules established to utilize private persons to implement Chinese state policy, nor, in their application, contradict China’s claimed role in the international legal and political framework. Accordingly, two routes are offered as to how these laws should be applied: first, the legal restrains on private enforcement of the sanction laws should be made available; and secondly, China should ensure that its sanction laws do not compromise the New York Convention’s remit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信