评估天才识别系统的CASA标准:成本、一致性、敏感性和可及性

IF 3 3区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Gifted Child Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1177/00169862221124887

S. Peters, T. Stambaugh, Matthew C. Makel, L. Lee, Matthew T. McBee, D. McCoach, Kiana R. Johnson

{"title":"评估天才识别系统的CASA标准:成本、一致性、敏感性和可及性","authors":"S. Peters, T. Stambaugh, Matthew C. Makel, L. Lee, Matthew T. McBee, D. McCoach, Kiana R. Johnson","doi":"10.1177/00169862221124887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Debates over identification procedures for gifted and talented students dominate the field and serve as the topic of many of its internal and external debates. We believe this is due to a lack of commonly accepted criteria for how to evaluate identification procedures. In this article, we present the Cost, Alignment, Sensitivity, and Access (CASA) criteria, a framework to evaluate identification systems according to their cost, alignment to services, sensitivity, and access. We believe these criteria would facilitate more productive conversations over identification and continued growth and improvement for the field as a whole.","PeriodicalId":47514,"journal":{"name":"Gifted Child Quarterly","volume":"59 1","pages":"137 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The CASA Criteria for Evaluating Gifted and Talented Identification Systems: Cost, Alignment, Sensitivity, and Access\",\"authors\":\"S. Peters, T. Stambaugh, Matthew C. Makel, L. Lee, Matthew T. McBee, D. McCoach, Kiana R. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00169862221124887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Debates over identification procedures for gifted and talented students dominate the field and serve as the topic of many of its internal and external debates. We believe this is due to a lack of commonly accepted criteria for how to evaluate identification procedures. In this article, we present the Cost, Alignment, Sensitivity, and Access (CASA) criteria, a framework to evaluate identification systems according to their cost, alignment to services, sensitivity, and access. We believe these criteria would facilitate more productive conversations over identification and continued growth and improvement for the field as a whole.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gifted Child Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"137 - 150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gifted Child Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862221124887\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gifted Child Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862221124887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

关于天才学生的识别程序的争论主导了这个领域，并成为许多内部和外部辩论的主题。我们认为，这是由于缺乏普遍接受的标准，如何评估鉴定程序。在本文中，我们提出了成本、一致性、灵敏度和访问(CASA)标准，这是一个根据成本、服务一致性、灵敏度和访问来评估识别系统的框架。我们相信，这些标准将促进关于识别和整个领域持续增长和改进的更富有成效的对话。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The CASA Criteria for Evaluating Gifted and Talented Identification Systems: Cost, Alignment, Sensitivity, and Access

Debates over identification procedures for gifted and talented students dominate the field and serve as the topic of many of its internal and external debates. We believe this is due to a lack of commonly accepted criteria for how to evaluate identification procedures. In this article, we present the Cost, Alignment, Sensitivity, and Access (CASA) criteria, a framework to evaluate identification systems according to their cost, alignment to services, sensitivity, and access. We believe these criteria would facilitate more productive conversations over identification and continued growth and improvement for the field as a whole.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Gifted Child Quarterly Multiple-

CiteScore

6.30

自引率

29.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Gifted Child Quarterly (GCQ) is the official journal of the National Association for Gifted Children. As a leading journal in the field, GCQ publishes original scholarly reviews of the literature and quantitative or qualitative research studies. GCQ welcomes manuscripts offering new or creative insights about giftedness and talent development in the context of the school, the home, and the wider society. Manuscripts that explore policy and policy implications are also welcome. Additionally, GCQ reviews selected books relevant to the field, with an emphasis on scholarly texts or text with policy implications, and publishes reviews, essay reviews, and critiques.