用于测量多孔材料声学特性的三传声器和四传声器方法的误差比较

R. Muehleisen, C. Beamer
{"title":"用于测量多孔材料声学特性的三传声器和四传声器方法的误差比较","authors":"R. Muehleisen, C. Beamer","doi":"10.1121/1.1498175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The three-microphone and four-microphone methods have been shown useful for measuring the characteristic impedance and propagating wavenumber of porous materials. In this paper the effects of uncertainties in the apparatus and pressure transfer function measurements are analyzed using Monte Carlo methods. It is shown that for materials with low flow resistivities the four-microphone method is appreciably more accurate than the three-microphone method at low frequencies. The dominant contributors to the overall error are uncertainty in the magnitude and phase of the transfer function measurement.","PeriodicalId":87384,"journal":{"name":"Acoustics research letters online : ARLO","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of errors in the three- and four-microphone methods used in the measurement of the acoustic properties of porous materials\",\"authors\":\"R. Muehleisen, C. Beamer\",\"doi\":\"10.1121/1.1498175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The three-microphone and four-microphone methods have been shown useful for measuring the characteristic impedance and propagating wavenumber of porous materials. In this paper the effects of uncertainties in the apparatus and pressure transfer function measurements are analyzed using Monte Carlo methods. It is shown that for materials with low flow resistivities the four-microphone method is appreciably more accurate than the three-microphone method at low frequencies. The dominant contributors to the overall error are uncertainty in the magnitude and phase of the transfer function measurement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acoustics research letters online : ARLO\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acoustics research letters online : ARLO\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1498175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acoustics research letters online : ARLO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1498175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

三传声器和四传声器方法已被证明是测量多孔材料特性阻抗和传播波数的有效方法。本文用蒙特卡罗方法分析了不确定度对仪器和压力传递函数测量的影响。结果表明,对于低流动电阻率的材料,在低频情况下,四传声器法明显比三传声器法更精确。总体误差的主要贡献者是传递函数测量的幅度和相位的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of errors in the three- and four-microphone methods used in the measurement of the acoustic properties of porous materials
The three-microphone and four-microphone methods have been shown useful for measuring the characteristic impedance and propagating wavenumber of porous materials. In this paper the effects of uncertainties in the apparatus and pressure transfer function measurements are analyzed using Monte Carlo methods. It is shown that for materials with low flow resistivities the four-microphone method is appreciably more accurate than the three-microphone method at low frequencies. The dominant contributors to the overall error are uncertainty in the magnitude and phase of the transfer function measurement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信