Amet Çağrı Uyar, Alauddin Kochai̇, Mustafa Uysal, Abdülhalim Akar, Uğur Özdemi̇r
{"title":"Erişkin distal humerus kompleks kırıklarında ideal cerrahi tedavi seçeneği var mı?","authors":"Amet Çağrı Uyar, Alauddin Kochai̇, Mustafa Uysal, Abdülhalim Akar, Uğur Özdemi̇r","doi":"10.31832/smj.1190747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study is to define the ideal surgical treatment option for distal humerus fractures by comparing different surgical techniques. \n \nMaterial and methods: Seventy-one patients with distal humerus diaphysis fractures who were treated between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively investigated,. The patients were operated on with the posterior approach of open reduction and plate-screw osteosynthesis (Group A), plated with the minimal invasive technique (Group B), operated on using the lateral approach (Group C) and treated with an external fixator (Group D). Age, gender, mechanism of fracture, fracture type and AO class, applied surgical method, additional injuries, duration of operation, amount of bleeding, amount of fluoroscopy used, length of hospital stay, radiological angular values, union time, complications, and clinical examination findings of the patients were examined retrospectively and the differences between the mentioned surgical methods were investigated. \n \nResults: Blood loss was significantly less in Groups C and D (p","PeriodicalId":21405,"journal":{"name":"Sakarya Medical Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sakarya Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31832/smj.1190747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是通过比较不同的手术技术来确定肱骨远端骨折的理想手术治疗方案。材料与方法:回顾性分析2015 - 2020年间治疗的71例肱骨远端骨折患者。A组采用后路切开复位钢板螺钉固定术(A组),B组采用微创技术(B组),C组采用外侧入路(C组),D组采用外固定架(D组)。患者年龄、性别、骨折机制、骨折类型及AO分级、应用手术方式、附加损伤、手术时间、出血量、透视量、住院时间、回顾性分析患者的影像学角度值、愈合时间、并发症及临床检查结果,并探讨两种手术方式的差异。结果:C组和D组出血量明显减少(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Erişkin distal humerus kompleks kırıklarında ideal cerrahi tedavi seçeneği var mı?
Objective: The aim of this study is to define the ideal surgical treatment option for distal humerus fractures by comparing different surgical techniques. Material and methods: Seventy-one patients with distal humerus diaphysis fractures who were treated between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively investigated,. The patients were operated on with the posterior approach of open reduction and plate-screw osteosynthesis (Group A), plated with the minimal invasive technique (Group B), operated on using the lateral approach (Group C) and treated with an external fixator (Group D). Age, gender, mechanism of fracture, fracture type and AO class, applied surgical method, additional injuries, duration of operation, amount of bleeding, amount of fluoroscopy used, length of hospital stay, radiological angular values, union time, complications, and clinical examination findings of the patients were examined retrospectively and the differences between the mentioned surgical methods were investigated. Results: Blood loss was significantly less in Groups C and D (p
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信