İlknur Alkan-Kuşabbi, H. Aydoğmuş, H. Işık, A. Seven, B. Yuksel, Gülenay Gençosmanoğlu-Türkmen, D. Karçaaltıncaba, Y. Ergün, M. Çaydere, S. Batıoğlu
{"title":"液体子宫颈细胞学检查是否比传统子宫颈抹片检查更有效?","authors":"İlknur Alkan-Kuşabbi, H. Aydoğmuş, H. Işık, A. Seven, B. Yuksel, Gülenay Gençosmanoğlu-Türkmen, D. Karçaaltıncaba, Y. Ergün, M. Çaydere, S. Batıoğlu","doi":"10.29333/EJGM/81871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:To evaluate and compare the efficiencies of cytologic test methods conventional Pap smear (CVS) versus Thin Prep liquid-based cytology technique (TPT) in the histologic diagnosis of the precancerous lesions of the cervix and cervical cancer.Material and Methods:We selected randomly 1203 non-gravid women who were admitted to gynecology and menopause out-patient clinics of our hospital in the study. The cervical smear tests of all women were evaluated both using the conventional Pap smear and the TPT. Cytological examinations were compared according to their adequacy for evaluation. The evaluation of samples were performed and compared according to The Bethesda System.Results:The two screening methods were statistically compatible for evaluating the samples (κ=0,379 and p<0,001). The diagnosis interpreted by CPS and TPT methods were synchronous and this was also statistically significant (ĸ=0,829 ve p<0,001).Conclusions:Our cytohistologic diagnoses and samples' adequacy interpreted with CVS and TPT were statistically significantly synchronous.","PeriodicalId":12017,"journal":{"name":"European journal of general medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is liquid-based cervical cytology test more effective than conventional pap smear?\",\"authors\":\"İlknur Alkan-Kuşabbi, H. Aydoğmuş, H. Işık, A. Seven, B. Yuksel, Gülenay Gençosmanoğlu-Türkmen, D. Karçaaltıncaba, Y. Ergün, M. Çaydere, S. Batıoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.29333/EJGM/81871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction:To evaluate and compare the efficiencies of cytologic test methods conventional Pap smear (CVS) versus Thin Prep liquid-based cytology technique (TPT) in the histologic diagnosis of the precancerous lesions of the cervix and cervical cancer.Material and Methods:We selected randomly 1203 non-gravid women who were admitted to gynecology and menopause out-patient clinics of our hospital in the study. The cervical smear tests of all women were evaluated both using the conventional Pap smear and the TPT. Cytological examinations were compared according to their adequacy for evaluation. The evaluation of samples were performed and compared according to The Bethesda System.Results:The two screening methods were statistically compatible for evaluating the samples (κ=0,379 and p<0,001). The diagnosis interpreted by CPS and TPT methods were synchronous and this was also statistically significant (ĸ=0,829 ve p<0,001).Conclusions:Our cytohistologic diagnoses and samples' adequacy interpreted with CVS and TPT were statistically significantly synchronous.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of general medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of general medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29333/EJGM/81871\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of general medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/EJGM/81871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is liquid-based cervical cytology test more effective than conventional pap smear?
Introduction:To evaluate and compare the efficiencies of cytologic test methods conventional Pap smear (CVS) versus Thin Prep liquid-based cytology technique (TPT) in the histologic diagnosis of the precancerous lesions of the cervix and cervical cancer.Material and Methods:We selected randomly 1203 non-gravid women who were admitted to gynecology and menopause out-patient clinics of our hospital in the study. The cervical smear tests of all women were evaluated both using the conventional Pap smear and the TPT. Cytological examinations were compared according to their adequacy for evaluation. The evaluation of samples were performed and compared according to The Bethesda System.Results:The two screening methods were statistically compatible for evaluating the samples (κ=0,379 and p<0,001). The diagnosis interpreted by CPS and TPT methods were synchronous and this was also statistically significant (ĸ=0,829 ve p<0,001).Conclusions:Our cytohistologic diagnoses and samples' adequacy interpreted with CVS and TPT were statistically significantly synchronous.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
