Ryu和Opendaylight SDN控制器LACP实现的比较

2019 11th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE) Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI:10.1109/ICITEED.2019.8929986

F. Baskoro, Risanuri Hidayat, S. Wibowo

{"title":"Ryu和Opendaylight SDN控制器LACP实现的比较","authors":"F. Baskoro, Risanuri Hidayat, S. Wibowo","doi":"10.1109/ICITEED.2019.8929986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software Defined Network (SDN) is one of the recent trends in computer networks research. One of the issues faced by SDN deployment is the compatibility with the existing network infrastructure. One of them is the ability to handle Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP). This paper’s objective is to compare LACP implementation in Software Defined Network between two different SDN controller, Ryu, and Opendaylight. The experiment conducts in Mininet simulation and real hardware experiment. The parameters being observed are aggregation throughput and switchover-time. The results show that Ryu and Opendaylight have nearly the same aggregation throughput. While the switchover-time using Opendaylight is much faster rather than Ryu.","PeriodicalId":6598,"journal":{"name":"2019 11th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)","volume":"133 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing LACP Implementation between Ryu and Opendaylight SDN Controller\",\"authors\":\"F. Baskoro, Risanuri Hidayat, S. Wibowo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICITEED.2019.8929986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software Defined Network (SDN) is one of the recent trends in computer networks research. One of the issues faced by SDN deployment is the compatibility with the existing network infrastructure. One of them is the ability to handle Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP). This paper’s objective is to compare LACP implementation in Software Defined Network between two different SDN controller, Ryu, and Opendaylight. The experiment conducts in Mininet simulation and real hardware experiment. The parameters being observed are aggregation throughput and switchover-time. The results show that Ryu and Opendaylight have nearly the same aggregation throughput. While the switchover-time using Opendaylight is much faster rather than Ryu.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 11th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 11th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEED.2019.8929986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 11th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEED.2019.8929986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

软件定义网络(SDN)是计算机网络研究的最新趋势之一。SDN部署面临的问题之一是与现有网络基础设施的兼容性。其中之一是处理链路聚合控制协议(LACP)的能力。本文的目的是比较两种不同的SDN控制器Ryu和Opendaylight在软件定义网络中的LACP实现。实验在Mininet仿真和真实硬件实验中进行。观察到的参数是聚合吞吐量和切换时间。结果表明，Ryu和Opendaylight具有几乎相同的聚合吞吐量。而Opendaylight的切换时间比Ryu快得多。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparing LACP Implementation between Ryu and Opendaylight SDN Controller

Software Defined Network (SDN) is one of the recent trends in computer networks research. One of the issues faced by SDN deployment is the compatibility with the existing network infrastructure. One of them is the ability to handle Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP). This paper’s objective is to compare LACP implementation in Software Defined Network between two different SDN controller, Ryu, and Opendaylight. The experiment conducts in Mininet simulation and real hardware experiment. The parameters being observed are aggregation throughput and switchover-time. The results show that Ryu and Opendaylight have nearly the same aggregation throughput. While the switchover-time using Opendaylight is much faster rather than Ryu.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2019 11th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)

自引率

0.00%

发文量