驯服革命:十月革命一百年后的记忆政治

IF 0.5 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
J. Richter
{"title":"驯服革命:十月革命一百年后的记忆政治","authors":"J. Richter","doi":"10.2979/histmemo.31.2.0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines the mnemonic strategies of the Putin administration in and around the centenary year of the Russian revolution in 2017. Given the contested nature of the Soviet legacy in Russian politics, the Kremlin sought to depoliticize the revolution by playing down the ideological struggles and focusing instead on the turmoil and suffering it had caused to Russians of all classes and convictions. In addition, because the Bolshevik revolution marked a disruptive moment that might contradict President Vladimir Putin's narrative of a Russian \"civilizational\" identity with roots in the distant past, the Kremlin reframed the revolution, and the Soviet era in general, within a cyclical grand narrative punctuated by \"times of troubles\" between one regime system and another, which was also applied to the rise of Putin after the chaotic 1990s.","PeriodicalId":43327,"journal":{"name":"History & Memory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taming the Revolution: The Politics of Memory One Hundred Years after October\",\"authors\":\"J. Richter\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/histmemo.31.2.0045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article examines the mnemonic strategies of the Putin administration in and around the centenary year of the Russian revolution in 2017. Given the contested nature of the Soviet legacy in Russian politics, the Kremlin sought to depoliticize the revolution by playing down the ideological struggles and focusing instead on the turmoil and suffering it had caused to Russians of all classes and convictions. In addition, because the Bolshevik revolution marked a disruptive moment that might contradict President Vladimir Putin's narrative of a Russian \\\"civilizational\\\" identity with roots in the distant past, the Kremlin reframed the revolution, and the Soviet era in general, within a cyclical grand narrative punctuated by \\\"times of troubles\\\" between one regime system and another, which was also applied to the rise of Putin after the chaotic 1990s.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History & Memory\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History & Memory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/histmemo.31.2.0045\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History & Memory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/histmemo.31.2.0045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文考察了普京政府在2017年俄国革命百年纪念期间及其前后的记忆策略。鉴于苏联遗产在俄罗斯政治中的争议性,克里姆林宫试图通过淡化意识形态斗争,转而关注它给所有阶级和信仰的俄罗斯人带来的动荡和痛苦,从而使这场革命非政治化。此外,由于布尔什维克革命标志着一个颠覆性的时刻,这可能与弗拉基米尔•普京(Vladimir Putin)总统关于俄罗斯“文明”身份源自遥远的过去的叙述相矛盾,克里姆林宫重新定义了这场革命和整个苏联时代,在一个政权体系与另一个政权体系之间穿插着“麻烦时期”的周期性宏大叙事中,这也适用于普京在混乱的20世纪90年代之后的崛起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Taming the Revolution: The Politics of Memory One Hundred Years after October
Abstract:This article examines the mnemonic strategies of the Putin administration in and around the centenary year of the Russian revolution in 2017. Given the contested nature of the Soviet legacy in Russian politics, the Kremlin sought to depoliticize the revolution by playing down the ideological struggles and focusing instead on the turmoil and suffering it had caused to Russians of all classes and convictions. In addition, because the Bolshevik revolution marked a disruptive moment that might contradict President Vladimir Putin's narrative of a Russian "civilizational" identity with roots in the distant past, the Kremlin reframed the revolution, and the Soviet era in general, within a cyclical grand narrative punctuated by "times of troubles" between one regime system and another, which was also applied to the rise of Putin after the chaotic 1990s.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
History & Memory
History & Memory HISTORY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信