Rosa María Muñoz Corte , Raúl García Estepa , Bernardo Santos Ramos , Francisco Javier Bautista Paloma
{"title":"在安达卢西亚综合护理程序的药物治疗建议的质量","authors":"Rosa María Muñoz Corte , Raúl García Estepa , Bernardo Santos Ramos , Francisco Javier Bautista Paloma","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70092-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the quality of the pharmacotherapeutic recommendations included in the Integrated Care Processes (PAIs regarding its initials in Spanish) of the Andalusian Ministry of Health, published up to March 2008, through the design and validation of a tool.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The assessment tool was designed based on similar instruments, specifically the AGREE. Other criteria included were taken from various literature sources or were devised by ourselves. The tool was validated prior to being used. After applying it to all the PAIs, we examined the degree of compliance with these pharmacotherapeutical criteria, both as a whole and by PAIs subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The developed tool is a questionnaire of 20 items, divided into 4 sections. The first section consists of the essential criteria, and the rest make reference to more specific, non essential criteria: definition of the level of evidence, thoroughness of information and definition of indicators. It was found that 4 of the 60 PAIs do not contain any type of therapeutic recommendation. No PAI fulfils all the items listed in the tool, however, 70 % of them fulfil the essential quality criteria established.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is a great variability in the content of pharmacotherapeutical recommendations for each PAI. Once the validity of the tool has been proved, it could be used to assess the quality of the therapeutic recommendations in clinical practice guidelines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"33 5","pages":"Pages 269-280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70092-9","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of the pharmacotherapeutic recommendations for the integrated care procedures in Andalusia\",\"authors\":\"Rosa María Muñoz Corte , Raúl García Estepa , Bernardo Santos Ramos , Francisco Javier Bautista Paloma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70092-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the quality of the pharmacotherapeutic recommendations included in the Integrated Care Processes (PAIs regarding its initials in Spanish) of the Andalusian Ministry of Health, published up to March 2008, through the design and validation of a tool.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The assessment tool was designed based on similar instruments, specifically the AGREE. Other criteria included were taken from various literature sources or were devised by ourselves. The tool was validated prior to being used. After applying it to all the PAIs, we examined the degree of compliance with these pharmacotherapeutical criteria, both as a whole and by PAIs subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The developed tool is a questionnaire of 20 items, divided into 4 sections. The first section consists of the essential criteria, and the rest make reference to more specific, non essential criteria: definition of the level of evidence, thoroughness of information and definition of indicators. It was found that 4 of the 60 PAIs do not contain any type of therapeutic recommendation. No PAI fulfils all the items listed in the tool, however, 70 % of them fulfil the essential quality criteria established.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is a great variability in the content of pharmacotherapeutical recommendations for each PAI. Once the validity of the tool has been proved, it could be used to assess the quality of the therapeutic recommendations in clinical practice guidelines.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 269-280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70092-9\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508509700929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508509700929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quality of the pharmacotherapeutic recommendations for the integrated care procedures in Andalusia
Objectives
To evaluate the quality of the pharmacotherapeutic recommendations included in the Integrated Care Processes (PAIs regarding its initials in Spanish) of the Andalusian Ministry of Health, published up to March 2008, through the design and validation of a tool.
Methods
The assessment tool was designed based on similar instruments, specifically the AGREE. Other criteria included were taken from various literature sources or were devised by ourselves. The tool was validated prior to being used. After applying it to all the PAIs, we examined the degree of compliance with these pharmacotherapeutical criteria, both as a whole and by PAIs subgroups.
Results
The developed tool is a questionnaire of 20 items, divided into 4 sections. The first section consists of the essential criteria, and the rest make reference to more specific, non essential criteria: definition of the level of evidence, thoroughness of information and definition of indicators. It was found that 4 of the 60 PAIs do not contain any type of therapeutic recommendation. No PAI fulfils all the items listed in the tool, however, 70 % of them fulfil the essential quality criteria established.
Conclusions
There is a great variability in the content of pharmacotherapeutical recommendations for each PAI. Once the validity of the tool has been proved, it could be used to assess the quality of the therapeutic recommendations in clinical practice guidelines.