对世俗主权的追求:韩国政治神学中的审判

IF 0.7 2区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY
Kyunghee Yi
{"title":"对世俗主权的追求:韩国政治神学中的审判","authors":"Kyunghee Yi","doi":"10.1080/21567689.2022.2150175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This research attempts to unearth the political nature of Korean liberal theology, yet an adjudicative tradition has not been previously studied. Amidst the turmoil of the constitutional battles of the 1970s, a group of liberal theologians appeared. Cutting through the well-worn claim that the nation was the best conceptual vehicle to deliver the Korean people’s will, they propounded the idea of popular sovereignty. Inaugurating a new public theatre of vigorous polyphonic controversy about the Korean polity, their novel treatment of the true nature of political authority recast the people as a whole as God’s agency through which He fulfilled his unfolding earthly purposes. In the canon of this workmanship model, their juridical recasting of the relation between God and his people gave it a contractarian nature. The renewed legal and normative substances endowed upon the singular sphere of the individual in God’s world set out a theoretical proposition for the nascent Korean notion of democratic representation ultimately. This marked the birth of the Korean political theology. The principle objective of this survey is to enter this now-lost intellectual world and glean how it shaped modern Korean political thought.","PeriodicalId":44955,"journal":{"name":"Politics Religion & Ideology","volume":"25 1","pages":"389 - 406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questing for an earthly sovereign: Adjudication in Korean political theology\",\"authors\":\"Kyunghee Yi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21567689.2022.2150175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This research attempts to unearth the political nature of Korean liberal theology, yet an adjudicative tradition has not been previously studied. Amidst the turmoil of the constitutional battles of the 1970s, a group of liberal theologians appeared. Cutting through the well-worn claim that the nation was the best conceptual vehicle to deliver the Korean people’s will, they propounded the idea of popular sovereignty. Inaugurating a new public theatre of vigorous polyphonic controversy about the Korean polity, their novel treatment of the true nature of political authority recast the people as a whole as God’s agency through which He fulfilled his unfolding earthly purposes. In the canon of this workmanship model, their juridical recasting of the relation between God and his people gave it a contractarian nature. The renewed legal and normative substances endowed upon the singular sphere of the individual in God’s world set out a theoretical proposition for the nascent Korean notion of democratic representation ultimately. This marked the birth of the Korean political theology. The principle objective of this survey is to enter this now-lost intellectual world and glean how it shaped modern Korean political thought.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politics Religion & Ideology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"389 - 406\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politics Religion & Ideology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2022.2150175\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics Religion & Ideology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2022.2150175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究试图揭示韩国自由主义神学的政治本质,但其裁判传统尚未被研究。在20世纪70年代宪法斗争的混乱中,出现了一群自由主义神学家。他们打破了“国家是传达朝鲜人民意志的最佳概念载体”的陈词滥调,提出了人民主权的概念。他们开创了一个新的公共舞台,对朝鲜政体进行了激烈的复调辩论,他们对政治权威的真实本质的新颖处理,将人民作为一个整体重新塑造为上帝的代理,通过这个代理,上帝实现了他正在展开的世俗目的。在这种工艺模式的规范中,他们对上帝和他的子民之间关系的法律重塑赋予了它契约的性质。在上帝的世界中,赋予个人的单一领域的新的法律和规范物质最终为新生的韩国民主代表制概念提出了一个理论命题。这标志着韩国政治神学的诞生。这次调查的主要目的是进入这个已经消失的知识世界,并收集它是如何塑造现代韩国政治思想的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Questing for an earthly sovereign: Adjudication in Korean political theology
ABSTRACT This research attempts to unearth the political nature of Korean liberal theology, yet an adjudicative tradition has not been previously studied. Amidst the turmoil of the constitutional battles of the 1970s, a group of liberal theologians appeared. Cutting through the well-worn claim that the nation was the best conceptual vehicle to deliver the Korean people’s will, they propounded the idea of popular sovereignty. Inaugurating a new public theatre of vigorous polyphonic controversy about the Korean polity, their novel treatment of the true nature of political authority recast the people as a whole as God’s agency through which He fulfilled his unfolding earthly purposes. In the canon of this workmanship model, their juridical recasting of the relation between God and his people gave it a contractarian nature. The renewed legal and normative substances endowed upon the singular sphere of the individual in God’s world set out a theoretical proposition for the nascent Korean notion of democratic representation ultimately. This marked the birth of the Korean political theology. The principle objective of this survey is to enter this now-lost intellectual world and glean how it shaped modern Korean political thought.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信