《概论》第10节所指性与凯撒

IF 0.6 3区 数学 Q2 LOGIC
Bruno Bentzen
{"title":"《概论》第10节所指性与凯撒","authors":"Bruno Bentzen","doi":"10.1215/00294527-2019-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to answer the question of whether or not Frege's solution limited to value-ranges and truth-values proposed to resolve the \"problem of indeterminacy of reference\" in section 10 of Grundgesetze is a violation of his principle of complete determination, which states that a predicate must be defined to apply for all objects in general. Closely related to this doubt is the common allegation that Frege was unable to solve a persistent version of the Caesar problem for value-ranges. It is argued that, in Frege’s standards of reducing arithmetic to logic, his solution to the indeterminacy does not give rise to any sort of Caesar problem in the book.","PeriodicalId":51259,"journal":{"name":"Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic","volume":"10 1","pages":"617-637"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frege on Referentiality and Julius Caesar in Grundgesetze Section 10\",\"authors\":\"Bruno Bentzen\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/00294527-2019-0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to answer the question of whether or not Frege's solution limited to value-ranges and truth-values proposed to resolve the \\\"problem of indeterminacy of reference\\\" in section 10 of Grundgesetze is a violation of his principle of complete determination, which states that a predicate must be defined to apply for all objects in general. Closely related to this doubt is the common allegation that Frege was unable to solve a persistent version of the Caesar problem for value-ranges. It is argued that, in Frege’s standards of reducing arithmetic to logic, his solution to the indeterminacy does not give rise to any sort of Caesar problem in the book.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"617-637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/00294527-2019-0022\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LOGIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00294527-2019-0022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文旨在回答Frege在Grundgesetze第10节中为解决“参照不确定性问题”而提出的限于值范围和真值的解决方案是否违反了他的完全确定原则,即必须定义一个谓词才能适用于一般的所有对象。与这个疑问密切相关的是常见的断言,即Frege无法解决值范围的持久版本的Caesar问题。有人认为,在弗雷格将算术简化为逻辑的标准中,他对不确定性的解决不会引起书中任何形式的凯撒问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frege on Referentiality and Julius Caesar in Grundgesetze Section 10
This paper aims to answer the question of whether or not Frege's solution limited to value-ranges and truth-values proposed to resolve the "problem of indeterminacy of reference" in section 10 of Grundgesetze is a violation of his principle of complete determination, which states that a predicate must be defined to apply for all objects in general. Closely related to this doubt is the common allegation that Frege was unable to solve a persistent version of the Caesar problem for value-ranges. It is argued that, in Frege’s standards of reducing arithmetic to logic, his solution to the indeterminacy does not give rise to any sort of Caesar problem in the book.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, founded in 1960, aims to publish high quality and original research papers in philosophical logic, mathematical logic, and related areas, including papers of compelling historical interest. The Journal is also willing to selectively publish expository articles on important current topics of interest as well as book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信