批判二元论的批判:文化分析中本质主义方法的回归

Luis Reygadas
{"title":"批判二元论的批判:文化分析中本质主义方法的回归","authors":"Luis Reygadas","doi":"10.24275/uam/azc/dcsh/sm/2019v34n96/reygadas","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines a way of conceiving culture that could be called “critical dualism,” characterized both by its transformative orientation and by its resorting to dualist visions that separate societies and cultures into two opposing, inescapable kinds. Essentialist views of culture predominated for centuries, postulating that each society and group had a distinctive, Sociológica, año 34, número 96, enero-abril de 2019, pp. 73-106 Fecha de recepción: 26/04/18. Fecha de aceptación: 23/01/19 * Departamento de Antropología, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, unidad Iztapalapa. Correo electrónico: .","PeriodicalId":100019,"journal":{"name":"Acta Sociológica","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critique of Critical Dualism The Return of Essentialist Approaches in the Analysis of Culture\",\"authors\":\"Luis Reygadas\",\"doi\":\"10.24275/uam/azc/dcsh/sm/2019v34n96/reygadas\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines a way of conceiving culture that could be called “critical dualism,” characterized both by its transformative orientation and by its resorting to dualist visions that separate societies and cultures into two opposing, inescapable kinds. Essentialist views of culture predominated for centuries, postulating that each society and group had a distinctive, Sociológica, año 34, número 96, enero-abril de 2019, pp. 73-106 Fecha de recepción: 26/04/18. Fecha de aceptación: 23/01/19 * Departamento de Antropología, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, unidad Iztapalapa. Correo electrónico: .\",\"PeriodicalId\":100019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Sociológica\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Sociológica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/azc/dcsh/sm/2019v34n96/reygadas\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Sociológica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/azc/dcsh/sm/2019v34n96/reygadas","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了一种可以被称为“批判二元论”的文化构想方式,其特点是其变革取向和诉诸于将社会和文化分为两种对立的、不可避免的二元论观点。几个世纪以来,文化的本质主义观点占主导地位,假设每个社会和群体都有独特的,Sociológica, año 34, número 96, enero-abril de 2019, pp. 73-106 Fecha de recepción: 26/04/18。Fecha de aceptación: 23/01/19 * Iztapalapa, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Departamento de Antropología。Correo electrónico:。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critique of Critical Dualism The Return of Essentialist Approaches in the Analysis of Culture
This article examines a way of conceiving culture that could be called “critical dualism,” characterized both by its transformative orientation and by its resorting to dualist visions that separate societies and cultures into two opposing, inescapable kinds. Essentialist views of culture predominated for centuries, postulating that each society and group had a distinctive, Sociológica, año 34, número 96, enero-abril de 2019, pp. 73-106 Fecha de recepción: 26/04/18. Fecha de aceptación: 23/01/19 * Departamento de Antropología, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, unidad Iztapalapa. Correo electrónico: .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信