Hoang Minh Le, Quang Vuong Le, T. Tran, Van-Tao Chau
{"title":"用蒙特卡罗模拟和计算方法评价同轴高压锗探测器上marinelli烧杯的符合求和因子","authors":"Hoang Minh Le, Quang Vuong Le, T. Tran, Van-Tao Chau","doi":"10.53747/nst.v12i1.336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This investigation aims to compare the full energy peak efficiencies in the energy range of 46-1836 keV on a type-p coaxial HPGe and estimate the coincidence summing factor for the case of Marinelli Beaker samples used by two general Monte-Carlo simulation software MCNP and PENELOPE. The radioactive nuclides used in determining the coincidence summing factor include 22Na, 60Co, 88Y, 133Ba, 134Cs, 154Eu, and 208Tl, which are prepared in HCl 2M solution and contained in a Marinelli beaker with the source’s volume of 3000 ml. The results demonstrate there is a good agreement between the two simulation software with an average discrepancy of 1.3%. On the other hand, the simulation coincidence summing factor values are also compared with the results from the calculating software ETNA with an average discrepancy of approximately 3.1%.","PeriodicalId":19445,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating coincidence summing factor using marinelli beaker on coaxial HPGe detector by Monte Carlo simulation and calculating\",\"authors\":\"Hoang Minh Le, Quang Vuong Le, T. Tran, Van-Tao Chau\",\"doi\":\"10.53747/nst.v12i1.336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This investigation aims to compare the full energy peak efficiencies in the energy range of 46-1836 keV on a type-p coaxial HPGe and estimate the coincidence summing factor for the case of Marinelli Beaker samples used by two general Monte-Carlo simulation software MCNP and PENELOPE. The radioactive nuclides used in determining the coincidence summing factor include 22Na, 60Co, 88Y, 133Ba, 134Cs, 154Eu, and 208Tl, which are prepared in HCl 2M solution and contained in a Marinelli beaker with the source’s volume of 3000 ml. The results demonstrate there is a good agreement between the two simulation software with an average discrepancy of 1.3%. On the other hand, the simulation coincidence summing factor values are also compared with the results from the calculating software ETNA with an average discrepancy of approximately 3.1%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53747/nst.v12i1.336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53747/nst.v12i1.336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating coincidence summing factor using marinelli beaker on coaxial HPGe detector by Monte Carlo simulation and calculating
This investigation aims to compare the full energy peak efficiencies in the energy range of 46-1836 keV on a type-p coaxial HPGe and estimate the coincidence summing factor for the case of Marinelli Beaker samples used by two general Monte-Carlo simulation software MCNP and PENELOPE. The radioactive nuclides used in determining the coincidence summing factor include 22Na, 60Co, 88Y, 133Ba, 134Cs, 154Eu, and 208Tl, which are prepared in HCl 2M solution and contained in a Marinelli beaker with the source’s volume of 3000 ml. The results demonstrate there is a good agreement between the two simulation software with an average discrepancy of 1.3%. On the other hand, the simulation coincidence summing factor values are also compared with the results from the calculating software ETNA with an average discrepancy of approximately 3.1%.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
