环境政策一致性的障碍和促进因素：系统审查

IF 3 3区社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Environmental Policy and Governance Pub Date : 2023-05-02 DOI:10.1002/eet.2057

Alain Fopa Tchinda, David Talbot

{"title":"环境政策一致性的障碍和促进因素：系统审查","authors":"Alain Fopa Tchinda, David Talbot","doi":"10.1002/eet.2057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The literature on policy coherence (PC) examines contradictions and synergies between policies. This systematic review explores factors that facilitate or disrupt PC in the environmental field. Based on 70 empirical studies, this research describes the evolution of the PC literature, identifying eight critical PC factors. Furthermore, this study identifies six avenues for future research on PC, such as methodological innovations and including stakeholders in the policy development process. In addition to drawing on contradictions and synergies for PC analysis, this study suggests an integrative framework of barriers and enablers. These findings have implications for policymakers and program managers in the environmental field.</p>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"34 1","pages":"77-92"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.2057","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and enablers of environmental policy coherence: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Alain Fopa Tchinda, David Talbot\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eet.2057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The literature on policy coherence (PC) examines contradictions and synergies between policies. This systematic review explores factors that facilitate or disrupt PC in the environmental field. Based on 70 empirical studies, this research describes the evolution of the PC literature, identifying eight critical PC factors. Furthermore, this study identifies six avenues for future research on PC, such as methodological innovations and including stakeholders in the policy development process. In addition to drawing on contradictions and synergies for PC analysis, this study suggests an integrative framework of barriers and enablers. These findings have implications for policymakers and program managers in the environmental field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Policy and Governance\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"77-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.2057\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Policy and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.2057\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Policy and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.2057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

有关政策一致性（PC）的文献探讨了政策之间的矛盾和协同作用。本系统性综述探讨了在环境领域促进或破坏政策一致性的因素。本研究以 70 项实证研究为基础，描述了 PC 文献的演变过程，确定了八个关键的 PC 因素。此外，本研究还确定了未来 PC 研究的六条途径，如方法创新和将利益相关者纳入政策制定过程。除了借鉴 PC 分析的矛盾和协同作用外，本研究还提出了一个障碍和促进因素的综合框架。这些发现对环境领域的政策制定者和计划管理者具有借鉴意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Barriers and enablers of environmental policy coherence: A systematic review

查看原文本刊更多论文

Barriers and enablers of environmental policy coherence: A systematic review

The literature on policy coherence (PC) examines contradictions and synergies between policies. This systematic review explores factors that facilitate or disrupt PC in the environmental field. Based on 70 empirical studies, this research describes the evolution of the PC literature, identifying eight critical PC factors. Furthermore, this study identifies six avenues for future research on PC, such as methodological innovations and including stakeholders in the policy development process. In addition to drawing on contradictions and synergies for PC analysis, this study suggests an integrative framework of barriers and enablers. These findings have implications for policymakers and program managers in the environmental field.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Environmental Policy and Governance ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-

CiteScore

6.10

自引率

13.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Environmental Policy and Governance is an international, inter-disciplinary journal affiliated with the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE). The journal seeks to advance interdisciplinary environmental research and its use to support novel solutions in environmental policy and governance. The journal publishes innovative, high quality articles which examine, or are relevant to, the environmental policies that are introduced by governments or the diverse forms of environmental governance that emerge in markets and civil society. The journal includes papers that examine how different forms of policy and governance emerge and exert influence at scales ranging from local to global and in diverse developmental and environmental contexts.