重新思考学习模块的设计:ICT支持下以评估为中心的策略

O. Herrera, Patrica Mejías, Alejandra Cid
{"title":"重新思考学习模块的设计:ICT支持下以评估为中心的策略","authors":"O. Herrera, Patrica Mejías, Alejandra Cid","doi":"10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9640128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The practice of teaching to train the professionals of the future is increasingly demanding. Many of the trainers in Higher Education Institutions do not have a training in pedagogy, so they do their best to achieve good results in their students. Teachers base their methodology on repeating patterns learned, training received, formal and informal support from pedagogical support units in universities, among other elements. This article presents a platform that supports the design of pedagogical strategies, which is based on three pillars. First, planning based on pedagogical criteria (Bloom's taxonomy and conversational framework). Second, a design that arises from assessment, understood as an always formative activity. And third, collaboration both in the design of the activities and in sharing these designs with others. This platform has been used for designs in the computing area with positive evaluations from the participating teachers. Teachers from other disciplines have also joined, confirming the usefulness and transversality of the platform. A direct impact on students with more solid and relevant learning is expected.","PeriodicalId":6803,"journal":{"name":"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)","volume":"26 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking the design of learning modules: An assessment centered strategy with ICT support\",\"authors\":\"O. Herrera, Patrica Mejías, Alejandra Cid\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9640128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The practice of teaching to train the professionals of the future is increasingly demanding. Many of the trainers in Higher Education Institutions do not have a training in pedagogy, so they do their best to achieve good results in their students. Teachers base their methodology on repeating patterns learned, training received, formal and informal support from pedagogical support units in universities, among other elements. This article presents a platform that supports the design of pedagogical strategies, which is based on three pillars. First, planning based on pedagogical criteria (Bloom's taxonomy and conversational framework). Second, a design that arises from assessment, understood as an always formative activity. And third, collaboration both in the design of the activities and in sharing these designs with others. This platform has been used for designs in the computing area with positive evaluations from the participating teachers. Teachers from other disciplines have also joined, confirming the usefulness and transversality of the platform. A direct impact on students with more solid and relevant learning is expected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9640128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI53233.2021.9640128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

培养未来专业人才的教学实践要求越来越高。许多高等教育机构的培训师没有接受过教育学方面的培训,所以他们尽最大努力在学生身上取得好成绩。教师的方法基于所学的重复模式、接受的培训、大学教学支助单位的正式和非正式支助等因素。本文提出了一个支持教学策略设计的平台,它基于三个支柱。首先,基于教学标准(布鲁姆的分类法和会话框架)的规划。第二,从评估中产生的设计,被理解为始终是形成性的活动。第三,在活动设计和与他人分享这些设计方面的合作。该平台已用于计算机领域的设计,并得到参与教师的积极评价。其他学科的老师也加入进来,证实了这个平台的实用性和横向性。通过更扎实和相关的学习,对学生产生直接影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking the design of learning modules: An assessment centered strategy with ICT support
The practice of teaching to train the professionals of the future is increasingly demanding. Many of the trainers in Higher Education Institutions do not have a training in pedagogy, so they do their best to achieve good results in their students. Teachers base their methodology on repeating patterns learned, training received, formal and informal support from pedagogical support units in universities, among other elements. This article presents a platform that supports the design of pedagogical strategies, which is based on three pillars. First, planning based on pedagogical criteria (Bloom's taxonomy and conversational framework). Second, a design that arises from assessment, understood as an always formative activity. And third, collaboration both in the design of the activities and in sharing these designs with others. This platform has been used for designs in the computing area with positive evaluations from the participating teachers. Teachers from other disciplines have also joined, confirming the usefulness and transversality of the platform. A direct impact on students with more solid and relevant learning is expected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信