胶体金快速检测与RT-PCR检测Sars-Cov-2的同步盲法及方法学比较

A. Mourtzikou, D. Tsiftsis, Maria Agrogianni, Nikolaos Kasimatis, Anthoula Dritsa, M. Stamouli, Panagiotis Koumpouros, Christina Seitopoulou, Elpida Toka
{"title":"胶体金快速检测与RT-PCR检测Sars-Cov-2的同步盲法及方法学比较","authors":"A. Mourtzikou, D. Tsiftsis, Maria Agrogianni, Nikolaos Kasimatis, Anthoula Dritsa, M. Stamouli, Panagiotis Koumpouros, Christina Seitopoulou, Elpida Toka","doi":"10.24018/ejbiomed.2022.1.5.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The current pandemic due to novel SARS-CoV-2 virus dramatically affected health care systems and public health worldwide. The present study aimed to evaluate two analytical methods, colloidal gold antigen rapid test vs reference PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. The patients enrolled in the trial were admitted at the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital, with symptoms of suspected COVID-19 disease.\nMethods: A total of 300 patients participated in the study. Patients’ age, gender and result from the Colloidal antigen rapid test were recorded. PCR detection for SARS-CoV-2 was then applied, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Statistical analysis of all collected data was performed for sensitivity, specificity, ROC curves, PV+, PV- and Cohen’s kappa coefficient. McNemar’s chi-squared test and p-values were also tested.\nResults: A p-value=0.045 from McNemar’s chi-squared test for CI 95% was observed, so H0 marginally is not rejected. The sensitivity of colloidal gold antigen rapid test was 79%, the specificity 96%, PV+89%, PV-91% and the kappa coefficient=0.79 (>0.5) that correlates to substantial agreement according to Cohen’s Kappa interpretation.\nConclusions: Through the methodological comparisons and according to WHO guidelines for the sensitivity, specificity and kappa coefficient that correlates to substantial agreement the Colloidal Gold Antigen Rapid Test for SARS-CoV-2 meet the needs of clinical test in the emergency unit playing an important role in the context of mass patient screening and screening in remote areas.","PeriodicalId":72970,"journal":{"name":"European journal of biomedical research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Synchronous Blind Test and Methodological Comparison Between Colloidal Gold Rapid Test vs RT-PCR For Sars-Cov-2 Detection\",\"authors\":\"A. Mourtzikou, D. Tsiftsis, Maria Agrogianni, Nikolaos Kasimatis, Anthoula Dritsa, M. Stamouli, Panagiotis Koumpouros, Christina Seitopoulou, Elpida Toka\",\"doi\":\"10.24018/ejbiomed.2022.1.5.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The current pandemic due to novel SARS-CoV-2 virus dramatically affected health care systems and public health worldwide. The present study aimed to evaluate two analytical methods, colloidal gold antigen rapid test vs reference PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. The patients enrolled in the trial were admitted at the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital, with symptoms of suspected COVID-19 disease.\\nMethods: A total of 300 patients participated in the study. Patients’ age, gender and result from the Colloidal antigen rapid test were recorded. PCR detection for SARS-CoV-2 was then applied, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Statistical analysis of all collected data was performed for sensitivity, specificity, ROC curves, PV+, PV- and Cohen’s kappa coefficient. McNemar’s chi-squared test and p-values were also tested.\\nResults: A p-value=0.045 from McNemar’s chi-squared test for CI 95% was observed, so H0 marginally is not rejected. The sensitivity of colloidal gold antigen rapid test was 79%, the specificity 96%, PV+89%, PV-91% and the kappa coefficient=0.79 (>0.5) that correlates to substantial agreement according to Cohen’s Kappa interpretation.\\nConclusions: Through the methodological comparisons and according to WHO guidelines for the sensitivity, specificity and kappa coefficient that correlates to substantial agreement the Colloidal Gold Antigen Rapid Test for SARS-CoV-2 meet the needs of clinical test in the emergency unit playing an important role in the context of mass patient screening and screening in remote areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of biomedical research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of biomedical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbiomed.2022.1.5.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of biomedical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbiomed.2022.1.5.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当前由新型SARS-CoV-2病毒引起的大流行严重影响了全球卫生保健系统和公共卫生。本研究旨在评价胶体金抗原快速检测法和参比PCR两种检测SARS-CoV-2的方法。参加试验的患者是一家三级保健医院的急诊科收治的,他们有疑似COVID-19疾病的症状。方法:共300例患者参与研究。记录患者年龄、性别及胶体抗原快速检测结果。然后根据制造商的说明进行SARS-CoV-2 PCR检测。对收集到的所有数据进行敏感性、特异性、ROC曲线、PV+、PV-和Cohen’s kappa系数的统计分析。McNemar卡方检验和p值也进行了检验。结果:McNemar卡方检验的p值=0.045,CI为95%,因此H0边际不被拒绝。胶体金抗原快速检测的敏感性为79%,特异性为96%,PV+89%, PV-91%, kappa系数=0.79(>0.5),根据Cohen’s kappa解释基本一致。结论:通过方法学比较,根据WHO指南对SARS-CoV-2的敏感性、特异性和相关kappa系数的基本一致,胶体金抗原快速检测满足急诊科临床检测的需要,在大规模患者筛查和偏远地区筛查的背景下发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Synchronous Blind Test and Methodological Comparison Between Colloidal Gold Rapid Test vs RT-PCR For Sars-Cov-2 Detection
Background: The current pandemic due to novel SARS-CoV-2 virus dramatically affected health care systems and public health worldwide. The present study aimed to evaluate two analytical methods, colloidal gold antigen rapid test vs reference PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. The patients enrolled in the trial were admitted at the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital, with symptoms of suspected COVID-19 disease. Methods: A total of 300 patients participated in the study. Patients’ age, gender and result from the Colloidal antigen rapid test were recorded. PCR detection for SARS-CoV-2 was then applied, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Statistical analysis of all collected data was performed for sensitivity, specificity, ROC curves, PV+, PV- and Cohen’s kappa coefficient. McNemar’s chi-squared test and p-values were also tested. Results: A p-value=0.045 from McNemar’s chi-squared test for CI 95% was observed, so H0 marginally is not rejected. The sensitivity of colloidal gold antigen rapid test was 79%, the specificity 96%, PV+89%, PV-91% and the kappa coefficient=0.79 (>0.5) that correlates to substantial agreement according to Cohen’s Kappa interpretation. Conclusions: Through the methodological comparisons and according to WHO guidelines for the sensitivity, specificity and kappa coefficient that correlates to substantial agreement the Colloidal Gold Antigen Rapid Test for SARS-CoV-2 meet the needs of clinical test in the emergency unit playing an important role in the context of mass patient screening and screening in remote areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信