埃德蒙·斯宾塞《仙后》中的海商法

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Spenser Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1086/717192
H. Cotter
{"title":"埃德蒙·斯宾塞《仙后》中的海商法","authors":"H. Cotter","doi":"10.1086/717192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, I offer a new interpretation of the Amidas/Bracidas episode in Book V of Edmund Spenser’s The Faerie Queene. I argue two complementary points: first, that Spenser included the judgment on the strand as a direct commentary on the English admiralty jurisdiction controversy; and second, that previous critics have erred by not considering the episode within the larger context of maritime adjudication across the poem. My reading rests on two interpretive approaches. The first assumes external knowledge of the legal issues presented in the episode. The second assumes internal knowledge of The Faerie Queene’s general treatment of admiralty jurisdiction. Ultimately, I contend that this episode demonstrates Spenser’s call for compromise in the English conflicts over admiralty jurisdiction and illustrates how he creates meaning through a calculated interplay among allusions both within and beyond his allegory.","PeriodicalId":39606,"journal":{"name":"Spenser Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wrecked upon the Sands: Maritime Law in Edmund Spenser’s The Faerie Queene\",\"authors\":\"H. Cotter\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/717192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this essay, I offer a new interpretation of the Amidas/Bracidas episode in Book V of Edmund Spenser’s The Faerie Queene. I argue two complementary points: first, that Spenser included the judgment on the strand as a direct commentary on the English admiralty jurisdiction controversy; and second, that previous critics have erred by not considering the episode within the larger context of maritime adjudication across the poem. My reading rests on two interpretive approaches. The first assumes external knowledge of the legal issues presented in the episode. The second assumes internal knowledge of The Faerie Queene’s general treatment of admiralty jurisdiction. Ultimately, I contend that this episode demonstrates Spenser’s call for compromise in the English conflicts over admiralty jurisdiction and illustrates how he creates meaning through a calculated interplay among allusions both within and beyond his allegory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spenser Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spenser Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/717192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spenser Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我对埃德蒙·斯宾塞的《仙后》第五卷中阿米达斯/布拉西达斯的情节进行了新的解读。我提出了两个互补的观点:第一,斯宾塞将《河岸判决》作为对英国海事管辖权争议的直接评论;其次,之前的评论家们犯了错误,他们没有把这一集放在诗歌中海事裁决的大背景下考虑。我的阅读基于两种解释方法。第一种假设是本集所呈现的法律问题具有外部知识。第二个假设内部知识的仙女女王的一般处理海事管辖权。最后,我认为这一集展示了斯宾塞在英国海事管辖权冲突中对妥协的呼吁,并说明了他如何通过寓言内外典故之间的精心设计的相互作用来创造意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wrecked upon the Sands: Maritime Law in Edmund Spenser’s The Faerie Queene
In this essay, I offer a new interpretation of the Amidas/Bracidas episode in Book V of Edmund Spenser’s The Faerie Queene. I argue two complementary points: first, that Spenser included the judgment on the strand as a direct commentary on the English admiralty jurisdiction controversy; and second, that previous critics have erred by not considering the episode within the larger context of maritime adjudication across the poem. My reading rests on two interpretive approaches. The first assumes external knowledge of the legal issues presented in the episode. The second assumes internal knowledge of The Faerie Queene’s general treatment of admiralty jurisdiction. Ultimately, I contend that this episode demonstrates Spenser’s call for compromise in the English conflicts over admiralty jurisdiction and illustrates how he creates meaning through a calculated interplay among allusions both within and beyond his allegory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spenser Studies
Spenser Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信