Kevin Saraiya Pg, Deepk Dave Prof, Kesha Vaghani Pg
{"title":"牙周治疗后牙本质过敏两种治疗方式的比较。","authors":"Kevin Saraiya Pg, Deepk Dave Prof, Kesha Vaghani Pg","doi":"10.33882/JIDA.13.6.24784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brief Background To evaluate and compare efficacy of 1.23% Acidulated Phosphate Fluoride (APF) gel with iontophoresis and topically applied calcium sodium phosphosillicate in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Materials and Methods In this clinical study, a total of 72 participants with dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) after periodontal treatment were included. 36 participants were assigned to the test group, treated with 1.23% APF gel iontophoresis and 36 participants were in the control group, treated with topical application of calcium sodium phosphosillicate. The VAS score was measured using tactile, air blast and cold-water test at baseline, 2 weeks and 2 months. Results Inter group comparison showed, statistically significant reduction in difference from baseline to 2 weeks follow-up and baseline to 2 months follow-up in VAS score in test group as compared to control group (p<0.001) except for difference from baseline to 2 weeks in air blast test where test and control group showed same reduction. Difference from 2 weeks to 2 months showed no statistically significant reduction in both groups. Intra group comparison showed, statistically significant reduction in baseline to 2 weeks and baseline to 2 months in both groups and from 2 weeks to 2 months no statistically significant reduction in VAS score in both groups. Summary and Conclusions Within the limitation of the study, it can be concluded that iontophoresis with 1.23% APF gel is more effective. Key Words: 1.23 % APF gel;Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate;Chronic periodontitis; Dentinal hypersensitivity, Periodontal therapy; VAS score","PeriodicalId":76040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Dental Association","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of two treatment modalities for treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity following periodontal therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Saraiya Pg, Deepk Dave Prof, Kesha Vaghani Pg\",\"doi\":\"10.33882/JIDA.13.6.24784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Brief Background To evaluate and compare efficacy of 1.23% Acidulated Phosphate Fluoride (APF) gel with iontophoresis and topically applied calcium sodium phosphosillicate in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Materials and Methods In this clinical study, a total of 72 participants with dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) after periodontal treatment were included. 36 participants were assigned to the test group, treated with 1.23% APF gel iontophoresis and 36 participants were in the control group, treated with topical application of calcium sodium phosphosillicate. The VAS score was measured using tactile, air blast and cold-water test at baseline, 2 weeks and 2 months. Results Inter group comparison showed, statistically significant reduction in difference from baseline to 2 weeks follow-up and baseline to 2 months follow-up in VAS score in test group as compared to control group (p<0.001) except for difference from baseline to 2 weeks in air blast test where test and control group showed same reduction. Difference from 2 weeks to 2 months showed no statistically significant reduction in both groups. Intra group comparison showed, statistically significant reduction in baseline to 2 weeks and baseline to 2 months in both groups and from 2 weeks to 2 months no statistically significant reduction in VAS score in both groups. Summary and Conclusions Within the limitation of the study, it can be concluded that iontophoresis with 1.23% APF gel is more effective. Key Words: 1.23 % APF gel;Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate;Chronic periodontitis; Dentinal hypersensitivity, Periodontal therapy; VAS score\",\"PeriodicalId\":76040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Indian Dental Association\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Indian Dental Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33882/JIDA.13.6.24784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33882/JIDA.13.6.24784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of two treatment modalities for treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity following periodontal therapy.
Brief Background To evaluate and compare efficacy of 1.23% Acidulated Phosphate Fluoride (APF) gel with iontophoresis and topically applied calcium sodium phosphosillicate in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Materials and Methods In this clinical study, a total of 72 participants with dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) after periodontal treatment were included. 36 participants were assigned to the test group, treated with 1.23% APF gel iontophoresis and 36 participants were in the control group, treated with topical application of calcium sodium phosphosillicate. The VAS score was measured using tactile, air blast and cold-water test at baseline, 2 weeks and 2 months. Results Inter group comparison showed, statistically significant reduction in difference from baseline to 2 weeks follow-up and baseline to 2 months follow-up in VAS score in test group as compared to control group (p<0.001) except for difference from baseline to 2 weeks in air blast test where test and control group showed same reduction. Difference from 2 weeks to 2 months showed no statistically significant reduction in both groups. Intra group comparison showed, statistically significant reduction in baseline to 2 weeks and baseline to 2 months in both groups and from 2 weeks to 2 months no statistically significant reduction in VAS score in both groups. Summary and Conclusions Within the limitation of the study, it can be concluded that iontophoresis with 1.23% APF gel is more effective. Key Words: 1.23 % APF gel;Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate;Chronic periodontitis; Dentinal hypersensitivity, Periodontal therapy; VAS score