牙周治疗后牙本质过敏两种治疗方式的比较。

Kevin Saraiya Pg, Deepk Dave Prof, Kesha Vaghani Pg
{"title":"牙周治疗后牙本质过敏两种治疗方式的比较。","authors":"Kevin Saraiya Pg, Deepk Dave Prof, Kesha Vaghani Pg","doi":"10.33882/JIDA.13.6.24784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brief Background To evaluate and compare efficacy of 1.23% Acidulated Phosphate Fluoride (APF) gel with iontophoresis and topically applied calcium sodium phosphosillicate in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Materials and Methods In this clinical study, a total of 72 participants with dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) after periodontal treatment were included. 36 participants were assigned to the test group, treated with 1.23% APF gel iontophoresis and 36 participants were in the control group, treated with topical application of calcium sodium phosphosillicate. The VAS score was measured using tactile, air blast and cold-water test at baseline, 2 weeks and 2 months. Results Inter group comparison showed, statistically significant reduction in difference from baseline to 2 weeks follow-up and baseline to 2 months follow-up in VAS score in test group as compared to control group (p<0.001) except for difference from baseline to 2 weeks in air blast test where test and control group showed same reduction. Difference from 2 weeks to 2 months showed no statistically significant reduction in both groups. Intra group comparison showed, statistically significant reduction in baseline to 2 weeks and baseline to 2 months in both groups and from 2 weeks to 2 months no statistically significant reduction in VAS score in both groups. Summary and Conclusions Within the limitation of the study, it can be concluded that iontophoresis with 1.23% APF gel is more effective. Key Words: 1.23 % APF gel;Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate;Chronic periodontitis; Dentinal hypersensitivity, Periodontal therapy; VAS score","PeriodicalId":76040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Dental Association","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of two treatment modalities for treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity following periodontal therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Saraiya Pg, Deepk Dave Prof, Kesha Vaghani Pg\",\"doi\":\"10.33882/JIDA.13.6.24784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Brief Background To evaluate and compare efficacy of 1.23% Acidulated Phosphate Fluoride (APF) gel with iontophoresis and topically applied calcium sodium phosphosillicate in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Materials and Methods In this clinical study, a total of 72 participants with dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) after periodontal treatment were included. 36 participants were assigned to the test group, treated with 1.23% APF gel iontophoresis and 36 participants were in the control group, treated with topical application of calcium sodium phosphosillicate. The VAS score was measured using tactile, air blast and cold-water test at baseline, 2 weeks and 2 months. Results Inter group comparison showed, statistically significant reduction in difference from baseline to 2 weeks follow-up and baseline to 2 months follow-up in VAS score in test group as compared to control group (p<0.001) except for difference from baseline to 2 weeks in air blast test where test and control group showed same reduction. Difference from 2 weeks to 2 months showed no statistically significant reduction in both groups. Intra group comparison showed, statistically significant reduction in baseline to 2 weeks and baseline to 2 months in both groups and from 2 weeks to 2 months no statistically significant reduction in VAS score in both groups. Summary and Conclusions Within the limitation of the study, it can be concluded that iontophoresis with 1.23% APF gel is more effective. Key Words: 1.23 % APF gel;Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate;Chronic periodontitis; Dentinal hypersensitivity, Periodontal therapy; VAS score\",\"PeriodicalId\":76040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Indian Dental Association\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Indian Dental Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33882/JIDA.13.6.24784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33882/JIDA.13.6.24784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要背景:评价和比较1.23%磷酸氟化磷酸酯凝胶离子透入与局部应用磷酸硅酸钙钠治疗牙本质过敏的疗效。材料与方法本临床研究共纳入72例牙周治疗后牙本质过敏(DH)患者。试验组36例,采用1.23% APF凝胶离子导入治疗;对照组36例,采用局部应用磷酸钙钠治疗。分别在基线、2周和2个月时采用触觉、空气冲击和冷水测试进行VAS评分。结果组间比较显示,试验组VAS评分基线至随访2周、基线至随访2个月较对照组差异均有统计学意义(p<0.001),但空气爆破试验基线至随访2周差异无统计学意义(试验组与对照组差异无统计学意义)。从2周到2个月,两组差异无统计学意义。组内比较,两组基线至2周及基线至2个月评分均有统计学意义降低,2周至2个月VAS评分无统计学意义降低。在研究的限制范围内,可以得出1.23% APF凝胶的离子导入效果更好。关键词:1.23% APF凝胶;磷酸硅酸钙钠;慢性牙周炎;牙本质过敏,牙周治疗;脉管得分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of two treatment modalities for treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity following periodontal therapy.
Brief Background To evaluate and compare efficacy of 1.23% Acidulated Phosphate Fluoride (APF) gel with iontophoresis and topically applied calcium sodium phosphosillicate in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Materials and Methods In this clinical study, a total of 72 participants with dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) after periodontal treatment were included. 36 participants were assigned to the test group, treated with 1.23% APF gel iontophoresis and 36 participants were in the control group, treated with topical application of calcium sodium phosphosillicate. The VAS score was measured using tactile, air blast and cold-water test at baseline, 2 weeks and 2 months. Results Inter group comparison showed, statistically significant reduction in difference from baseline to 2 weeks follow-up and baseline to 2 months follow-up in VAS score in test group as compared to control group (p<0.001) except for difference from baseline to 2 weeks in air blast test where test and control group showed same reduction. Difference from 2 weeks to 2 months showed no statistically significant reduction in both groups. Intra group comparison showed, statistically significant reduction in baseline to 2 weeks and baseline to 2 months in both groups and from 2 weeks to 2 months no statistically significant reduction in VAS score in both groups. Summary and Conclusions Within the limitation of the study, it can be concluded that iontophoresis with 1.23% APF gel is more effective. Key Words: 1.23 % APF gel;Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate;Chronic periodontitis; Dentinal hypersensitivity, Periodontal therapy; VAS score
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信