“休克疗法”与Covid-19的刑事司法伤亡

Hannah Quirk
{"title":"“休克疗法”与Covid-19的刑事司法伤亡","authors":"Hannah Quirk","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2021.1885313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Covid-19 poses the greatest threat to the poor and to those with existing vulnerabilities. This meant that the criminal justice system was especially vulnerable to its ravages. The backlog of criminal cases in the CrownCourts has risen by over a third since the beginning of March 2020 to over 53,000 bymid-January 2021. This situation is unacceptable, unsustainable and possibly unlawful. The government is considering the ‘shock therapy’ of removing jury trials in some or all cases as a means to process cases more quickly. The advantages of such a proposal are obvious in terms of speed, savings and the safety of participants. The dangers are more abstract, but no less significant. This article considers: (1) The underlying problems thatmeant the criminal justice systemwas already in a weakened state when the pandemic began; (2) The inadequate response of HerMajesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) to the crisis; (3) The dangers of the ‘shock therapy’ to curtail jury trial, with reference to the Diplock Courts of Northern Ireland which it concludes could cause greater longer-term harm to the system than Covid-19 has done.","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"8 1","pages":"137 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Shock Therapy’ and The Criminal Justice Casualties of Covid-19\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Quirk\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09615768.2021.1885313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Covid-19 poses the greatest threat to the poor and to those with existing vulnerabilities. This meant that the criminal justice system was especially vulnerable to its ravages. The backlog of criminal cases in the CrownCourts has risen by over a third since the beginning of March 2020 to over 53,000 bymid-January 2021. This situation is unacceptable, unsustainable and possibly unlawful. The government is considering the ‘shock therapy’ of removing jury trials in some or all cases as a means to process cases more quickly. The advantages of such a proposal are obvious in terms of speed, savings and the safety of participants. The dangers are more abstract, but no less significant. This article considers: (1) The underlying problems thatmeant the criminal justice systemwas already in a weakened state when the pandemic began; (2) The inadequate response of HerMajesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) to the crisis; (3) The dangers of the ‘shock therapy’ to curtail jury trial, with reference to the Diplock Courts of Northern Ireland which it concludes could cause greater longer-term harm to the system than Covid-19 has done.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"King's law journal : KLJ\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"137 - 146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"King's law journal : KLJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2021.1885313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King's law journal : KLJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2021.1885313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Covid-19对穷人和现有弱势群体构成最大威胁。这意味着刑事司法系统特别容易受到其破坏。自2020年3月初以来,皇家法院积压的刑事案件增加了三分之一以上,到2021年1月中旬已超过5.3万起。这种情况是不可接受的、不可持续的,而且可能是非法的。政府正在研究在部分或全部案件中取消陪审团审判的“休克疗法”,以加快案件的处理速度。在速度、节省和参与者的安全方面,这种提议的优点是显而易见的。这些危险更加抽象,但同样重要。本文考虑:(1)在大流行开始时,导致刑事司法系统已经处于弱化状态的潜在问题;(2)英国法院和法庭服务处(HMCTS)对危机的反应不足;(3)以北爱尔兰迪普洛克法院为例,“休克疗法”限制陪审团审判的危险,它得出的结论是,这可能会对该系统造成比Covid-19更大的长期伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Shock Therapy’ and The Criminal Justice Casualties of Covid-19
Covid-19 poses the greatest threat to the poor and to those with existing vulnerabilities. This meant that the criminal justice system was especially vulnerable to its ravages. The backlog of criminal cases in the CrownCourts has risen by over a third since the beginning of March 2020 to over 53,000 bymid-January 2021. This situation is unacceptable, unsustainable and possibly unlawful. The government is considering the ‘shock therapy’ of removing jury trials in some or all cases as a means to process cases more quickly. The advantages of such a proposal are obvious in terms of speed, savings and the safety of participants. The dangers are more abstract, but no less significant. This article considers: (1) The underlying problems thatmeant the criminal justice systemwas already in a weakened state when the pandemic began; (2) The inadequate response of HerMajesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) to the crisis; (3) The dangers of the ‘shock therapy’ to curtail jury trial, with reference to the Diplock Courts of Northern Ireland which it concludes could cause greater longer-term harm to the system than Covid-19 has done.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信