瑞士社区药剂师是否在紧急避孕咨询中提到性传播感染的风险?模拟患者研究

M. Haag, S. Gudka, K. Hersberger, I. Arnet
{"title":"瑞士社区药剂师是否在紧急避孕咨询中提到性传播感染的风险?模拟患者研究","authors":"M. Haag, S. Gudka, K. Hersberger, I. Arnet","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2019.1661377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: Since 2002, Swiss community pharmacists have dispensed emergency contraception (EC) as pharmacist-only medicine ideally using the official Swiss protocol. Our study aimed to determine pharmacists’ resolution of an imaginary EC case, compliance with the protocol, and provision of information on the risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Methods: We conducted a simulated patient study with 69 students who each visited a community pharmacy. The scenario started with the student requesting the ‘morning after pill’. Current practice was assessed using an online evaluation form adapted from the Medication-Related Consultation Framework. Descriptive and statistical analyses were carried out. Results: All pharmacists correctly identified that the person needed EC. All pharmacists used an EC protocol and asked on average 10.9 (standard deviation 0.68) of 11 compulsory EC assessment questions. In total, 93% of pharmacists addressed EC counselling items and 56% addressed the risk of STIs, mainly by mentioning that condoms offered the best protection (76%). Conclusions: Community pharmacists correctly issued the EC, complied with the dispensing protocol and used their professional judgement to ensure optimal EC use. There is nevertheless room for improvement regarding pharmacists’ STI counselling. Finally, the protocol’s STI section could be enriched with specific information to guide counselling.","PeriodicalId":22423,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","volume":"64 1","pages":"407 - 412"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Swiss community pharmacists address the risk of sexually transmitted infections during a consultation on emergency contraception? A simulated patient study\",\"authors\":\"M. Haag, S. Gudka, K. Hersberger, I. Arnet\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13625187.2019.1661377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives: Since 2002, Swiss community pharmacists have dispensed emergency contraception (EC) as pharmacist-only medicine ideally using the official Swiss protocol. Our study aimed to determine pharmacists’ resolution of an imaginary EC case, compliance with the protocol, and provision of information on the risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Methods: We conducted a simulated patient study with 69 students who each visited a community pharmacy. The scenario started with the student requesting the ‘morning after pill’. Current practice was assessed using an online evaluation form adapted from the Medication-Related Consultation Framework. Descriptive and statistical analyses were carried out. Results: All pharmacists correctly identified that the person needed EC. All pharmacists used an EC protocol and asked on average 10.9 (standard deviation 0.68) of 11 compulsory EC assessment questions. In total, 93% of pharmacists addressed EC counselling items and 56% addressed the risk of STIs, mainly by mentioning that condoms offered the best protection (76%). Conclusions: Community pharmacists correctly issued the EC, complied with the dispensing protocol and used their professional judgement to ensure optimal EC use. There is nevertheless room for improvement regarding pharmacists’ STI counselling. Finally, the protocol’s STI section could be enriched with specific information to guide counselling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"407 - 412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2019.1661377\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2019.1661377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

摘要目的:自2002年以来,瑞士社区药剂师将紧急避孕药(EC)作为药剂师专用药物,理想情况下使用瑞士官方协议。我们的研究旨在确定药剂师对一个虚构的EC病例的解决方案,遵守协议,并提供有关性传播感染(sti)风险的信息。方法:我们对69名学生进行了模拟患者研究,每个学生都去了一家社区药房。这个场景始于学生要求服用“事后避孕药”。目前的做法是使用从药物相关咨询框架改编的在线评估表格进行评估。进行了描述性和统计分析。结果:所有药师均正确识别出患者需要体外循环。所有药剂师均采用EC方案,并在11个强制性EC评估问题中平均提问10.9个(标准差0.68)。总的来说,93%的药剂师处理了EC咨询项目,56%的药剂师处理了性传播感染的风险,主要是提到避孕套提供了最好的保护(76%)。结论:社区药师正确发放EC,遵守配药方案,运用专业判断,确保EC的最佳使用。然而,在药剂师的性传播感染咨询方面仍有改进的余地。最后,该协议的性传播感染部分可以丰富具体信息,以指导咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Swiss community pharmacists address the risk of sexually transmitted infections during a consultation on emergency contraception? A simulated patient study
Abstract Objectives: Since 2002, Swiss community pharmacists have dispensed emergency contraception (EC) as pharmacist-only medicine ideally using the official Swiss protocol. Our study aimed to determine pharmacists’ resolution of an imaginary EC case, compliance with the protocol, and provision of information on the risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Methods: We conducted a simulated patient study with 69 students who each visited a community pharmacy. The scenario started with the student requesting the ‘morning after pill’. Current practice was assessed using an online evaluation form adapted from the Medication-Related Consultation Framework. Descriptive and statistical analyses were carried out. Results: All pharmacists correctly identified that the person needed EC. All pharmacists used an EC protocol and asked on average 10.9 (standard deviation 0.68) of 11 compulsory EC assessment questions. In total, 93% of pharmacists addressed EC counselling items and 56% addressed the risk of STIs, mainly by mentioning that condoms offered the best protection (76%). Conclusions: Community pharmacists correctly issued the EC, complied with the dispensing protocol and used their professional judgement to ensure optimal EC use. There is nevertheless room for improvement regarding pharmacists’ STI counselling. Finally, the protocol’s STI section could be enriched with specific information to guide counselling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信