用于实验室和现场评价废物和污染土壤的发光细菌快速毒理学试验方法

A. Götzl, H. Malissa, W. Riepe
{"title":"用于实验室和现场评价废物和污染土壤的发光细菌快速毒理学试验方法","authors":"A. Götzl, H. Malissa, W. Riepe","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6521(1999)3:6<329::AID-FACT2>3.0.CO;2-Z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparison between a standard toxicological test with luminous bacteria based on DIN 38 412 L 341, 2 and a rapid test yield similar results. However, the standard deviation of the rapid test was lower than that of the standard test. Costs for material and instruments are low; the test is easy to handle and can be used on site. By appropriate choice of the dilution steps and proper timing by intercalating the individual sets of assays, the overall time required to obtain results can be shortened considerably compared to the standard test. In combination with a recently developed method for aqueous extraction this allows assessment of the risk in contaminated soil on site within 30–45 min. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Field Analyt Chem Technol 3: 329–337, 1999","PeriodicalId":12132,"journal":{"name":"Field Analytical Chemistry and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Rapid Toxicological Test Method with Luminous Bacteria for Laboratory - and On-Site Assessment of Wastes and Contaminated Soils\",\"authors\":\"A. Götzl, H. Malissa, W. Riepe\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6521(1999)3:6<329::AID-FACT2>3.0.CO;2-Z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Comparison between a standard toxicological test with luminous bacteria based on DIN 38 412 L 341, 2 and a rapid test yield similar results. However, the standard deviation of the rapid test was lower than that of the standard test. Costs for material and instruments are low; the test is easy to handle and can be used on site. By appropriate choice of the dilution steps and proper timing by intercalating the individual sets of assays, the overall time required to obtain results can be shortened considerably compared to the standard test. In combination with a recently developed method for aqueous extraction this allows assessment of the risk in contaminated soil on site within 30–45 min. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Field Analyt Chem Technol 3: 329–337, 1999\",\"PeriodicalId\":12132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Field Analytical Chemistry and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Field Analytical Chemistry and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6521(1999)3:6<329::AID-FACT2>3.0.CO;2-Z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Analytical Chemistry and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6521(1999)3:6<329::AID-FACT2>3.0.CO;2-Z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

基于DIN 38 412 L 341, 2的发光细菌的标准毒理学试验与快速试验的比较得出相似的结果。而快速试验的标准差低于标准试验。材料和仪器的成本低;该测试易于操作,可在现场使用。通过适当选择稀释步骤和插入单个测定集的适当时机,与标准试验相比,获得结果所需的总时间可以大大缩短。结合最近开发的水萃取方法,可以在30-45分钟内对现场污染土壤的风险进行评估。©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc。化学工程学报,2009,32 (3):329-337
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Rapid Toxicological Test Method with Luminous Bacteria for Laboratory - and On-Site Assessment of Wastes and Contaminated Soils
Comparison between a standard toxicological test with luminous bacteria based on DIN 38 412 L 341, 2 and a rapid test yield similar results. However, the standard deviation of the rapid test was lower than that of the standard test. Costs for material and instruments are low; the test is easy to handle and can be used on site. By appropriate choice of the dilution steps and proper timing by intercalating the individual sets of assays, the overall time required to obtain results can be shortened considerably compared to the standard test. In combination with a recently developed method for aqueous extraction this allows assessment of the risk in contaminated soil on site within 30–45 min. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Field Analyt Chem Technol 3: 329–337, 1999
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信