全民基本收入辩论的现状:描绘支持和反对全民基本收入的论据

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS

Basic Income Studies Pub Date : 2022-06-17 DOI:10.1515/bis-2021-0030

Dominic Afscharian, Viktoriia Muliavka, Marius S. Ostrowski, L. Siegel

{"title":"全民基本收入辩论的现状:描绘支持和反对全民基本收入的论据","authors":"Dominic Afscharian, Viktoriia Muliavka, Marius S. Ostrowski, L. Siegel","doi":"10.1515/bis-2021-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article provides a map of the UBI debate, structured into the main themes that guide and group the arguments on both sides. It finds that UBI’s supporters and opponents both draw on core principles of justice and freedom, focusing on need and poverty, discrimination and inequality, growth, social opportunity, individuality, and self-development. From an economic perspective, they both appeal to business concerns about efficiency, risk, flexibility, and consumption, as well as labour interests on work fulfilment, working conditions, remuneration, and bargaining. Likewise, they focus on political questions around welfare state reforms, redistribution, taxation and funding sources, democratic citizenship, and the prospects for cross-party policy coalitions. By providing an overview of the thematic pillars of the UBI debate, this article helps researchers and activists locate and orient themselves within the wider spectrum of opinion on UBI.","PeriodicalId":43898,"journal":{"name":"Basic Income Studies","volume":"58 1","pages":"213 - 237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The State of the UBI Debate: Mapping the Arguments for and against UBI\",\"authors\":\"Dominic Afscharian, Viktoriia Muliavka, Marius S. Ostrowski, L. Siegel\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/bis-2021-0030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article provides a map of the UBI debate, structured into the main themes that guide and group the arguments on both sides. It finds that UBI’s supporters and opponents both draw on core principles of justice and freedom, focusing on need and poverty, discrimination and inequality, growth, social opportunity, individuality, and self-development. From an economic perspective, they both appeal to business concerns about efficiency, risk, flexibility, and consumption, as well as labour interests on work fulfilment, working conditions, remuneration, and bargaining. Likewise, they focus on political questions around welfare state reforms, redistribution, taxation and funding sources, democratic citizenship, and the prospects for cross-party policy coalitions. By providing an overview of the thematic pillars of the UBI debate, this article helps researchers and activists locate and orient themselves within the wider spectrum of opinion on UBI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basic Income Studies\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"213 - 237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basic Income Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2021-0030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic Income Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2021-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本文提供了全民基本收入辩论的地图，分为指导和分组双方论点的主题。研究发现，全民基本收入的支持者和反对者都借鉴了正义和自由的核心原则，关注需求和贫困、歧视和不平等、增长、社会机会、个性和自我发展。从经济角度来看，它们都吸引了企业对效率、风险、灵活性和消费的关注，以及劳动利益对工作完成、工作条件、报酬和讨价还价的关注。同样，他们也关注福利国家改革、再分配、税收和资金来源、民主公民身份以及跨党派政策联盟的前景等政治问题。通过概述全民基本收入辩论的主题支柱，本文帮助研究人员和活动家在全民基本收入的更广泛的意见范围内定位和定位自己。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The State of the UBI Debate: Mapping the Arguments for and against UBI

Abstract This article provides a map of the UBI debate, structured into the main themes that guide and group the arguments on both sides. It finds that UBI’s supporters and opponents both draw on core principles of justice and freedom, focusing on need and poverty, discrimination and inequality, growth, social opportunity, individuality, and self-development. From an economic perspective, they both appeal to business concerns about efficiency, risk, flexibility, and consumption, as well as labour interests on work fulfilment, working conditions, remuneration, and bargaining. Likewise, they focus on political questions around welfare state reforms, redistribution, taxation and funding sources, democratic citizenship, and the prospects for cross-party policy coalitions. By providing an overview of the thematic pillars of the UBI debate, this article helps researchers and activists locate and orient themselves within the wider spectrum of opinion on UBI.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Basic Income Studies ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

18.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Basic income is a universal income grant available to every citizen without means test or work requirement. Academic discussion of basic income and related policies has been growing in the fields of economics, philosophy, political science, sociology, and public policy over the last few decades — with dozens of journal articles published each year, and basic income constituting the subject of more than 30 books in the last 10 years. In addition, the political discussion of basic income has been expanding through social organizations, NGOs and other advocacy groups. Internationally, recent years have witnessed the endorsement of basic income by grassroots movements as well as government officials in developing countries such as Brazil or South-Africa. As the community of people working on this issue has been expanding all over the world, incorporating grassroots activists, high profile academics — including several Nobel Prize winners in economics — and policymakers, the amount of high quality research on this topic has increased considerably. In the light of such extensive scholarship on this topic, the need to coordinate research efforts through a journal specifically devoted to basic income and cognate policies became pressing. Basic Income Studies (BIS) is the first academic journal to focus specifically on basic income and cognate policies.