数字图书馆中的视图和点击——眼睛和鼠标跟踪数据的比较可用性分析

Eliane Blumer, René Schneider
{"title":"数字图书馆中的视图和点击——眼睛和鼠标跟踪数据的比较可用性分析","authors":"Eliane Blumer, René Schneider","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, eye tracking and mouse tracking data collected from two Swiss digital library web sites are compared, with respect to their specific areas of interest in order to answer two questions: Firstly, to know, how far the perception of the corresponding areas of interests differed from site to site and how far general recommendations can be inferred from this comparison. Secondly, the dispersion on the gaze and the mouse click plots were compared with the results of the two methods with each other to see if one method can be replaced by each other or if both methods should rather be considered as complementary. The results show that especially the choice of color and the use of contrast strongly influence gazes and clicks and that some areas of interest mainly attract views, but not clicks and vice versa, which leads to a complementary distribution pattern, and makes the question of replacing one method by the other obsolete.","PeriodicalId":90875,"journal":{"name":"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics","volume":"28 1","pages":"278-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Views and Clicks in Digital Libraries - A Comparative Usability Analysis of Eye and Mouse Tracking Data\",\"authors\":\"Eliane Blumer, René Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/zenodo.17956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, eye tracking and mouse tracking data collected from two Swiss digital library web sites are compared, with respect to their specific areas of interest in order to answer two questions: Firstly, to know, how far the perception of the corresponding areas of interests differed from site to site and how far general recommendations can be inferred from this comparison. Secondly, the dispersion on the gaze and the mouse click plots were compared with the results of the two methods with each other to see if one method can be replaced by each other or if both methods should rather be considered as complementary. The results show that especially the choice of color and the use of contrast strongly influence gazes and clicks and that some areas of interest mainly attract views, but not clicks and vice versa, which leads to a complementary distribution pattern, and makes the question of replacing one method by the other obsolete.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"278-289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17956\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,从两个瑞士数字图书馆网站收集的眼动追踪和鼠标追踪数据进行比较,就他们的特定兴趣领域进行比较,以回答两个问题:首先,要知道,不同网站对相应兴趣领域的感知差异有多大,以及从这种比较中可以推断出多大程度的一般建议。其次,将注视图和鼠标点击图上的离散度与两种方法的结果进行比较,看一种方法是否可以相互替代,或者两种方法是否应该互补。结果表明,特别是颜色的选择和对比度的使用强烈影响凝视和点击,一些感兴趣的区域主要吸引观看,而不是点击,反之亦然,这导致了一种互补的分布模式,并使用一种方法替代另一种方法的问题过时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Views and Clicks in Digital Libraries - A Comparative Usability Analysis of Eye and Mouse Tracking Data
In this study, eye tracking and mouse tracking data collected from two Swiss digital library web sites are compared, with respect to their specific areas of interest in order to answer two questions: Firstly, to know, how far the perception of the corresponding areas of interests differed from site to site and how far general recommendations can be inferred from this comparison. Secondly, the dispersion on the gaze and the mouse click plots were compared with the results of the two methods with each other to see if one method can be replaced by each other or if both methods should rather be considered as complementary. The results show that especially the choice of color and the use of contrast strongly influence gazes and clicks and that some areas of interest mainly attract views, but not clicks and vice versa, which leads to a complementary distribution pattern, and makes the question of replacing one method by the other obsolete.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信