妇女能动性的意义:以卡塔尔为例:语境下的改进测量

Q1 Social Sciences
Yara Qutteina, Laurie James-Hawkins, Buthaina A. Al-Khelaifi, K. Yount
{"title":"妇女能动性的意义:以卡塔尔为例:语境下的改进测量","authors":"Yara Qutteina, Laurie James-Hawkins, Buthaina A. Al-Khelaifi, K. Yount","doi":"10.1080/21534764.2019.1649828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The measurement of women’s agency poses numerous challenges, including multi-dimensionality and context-specificity. This challenge is especially large for non-Western contexts that adapt measurement instruments without rigorous testing and comprehensive understanding of construct meanings in place. In this paper, we present a case study from Qatar where we investigate the face validity, comprehension and functionality of women’s agency scale items. Cognitive interviews were conducted with twenty-four women to capture their interpretations of decision-making, freedom-of-movement, and gender attitudes scale items. The majority of women originally reported that they made their own decisions; yet, further probing revealed otherwise. While women seemed to understand, as intended, the freedom-of-movement item, the items measuring gender attitudes were generally reflective of broader local societal norms rather than the women’s own opinions. This research highlights the need for deeper exploration into women’s understanding of an agency scale before its use in a new context.","PeriodicalId":37102,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arabian Studies","volume":"37 1","pages":"33 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meanings of Women’s Agency: A Case Study from Qatar on Improving Measurement in Context\",\"authors\":\"Yara Qutteina, Laurie James-Hawkins, Buthaina A. Al-Khelaifi, K. Yount\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21534764.2019.1649828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The measurement of women’s agency poses numerous challenges, including multi-dimensionality and context-specificity. This challenge is especially large for non-Western contexts that adapt measurement instruments without rigorous testing and comprehensive understanding of construct meanings in place. In this paper, we present a case study from Qatar where we investigate the face validity, comprehension and functionality of women’s agency scale items. Cognitive interviews were conducted with twenty-four women to capture their interpretations of decision-making, freedom-of-movement, and gender attitudes scale items. The majority of women originally reported that they made their own decisions; yet, further probing revealed otherwise. While women seemed to understand, as intended, the freedom-of-movement item, the items measuring gender attitudes were generally reflective of broader local societal norms rather than the women’s own opinions. This research highlights the need for deeper exploration into women’s understanding of an agency scale before its use in a new context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arabian Studies\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"33 - 51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arabian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21534764.2019.1649828\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arabian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21534764.2019.1649828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

女性能动性的测量面临着多方面的挑战,包括多维性和情境特异性。这一挑战对于非西方环境来说尤其大,因为这些环境在没有严格的测试和对结构意义的全面理解的情况下采用了测量工具。在本文中,我们提出了一个案例研究卡塔尔,我们调查了面孔效度,理解和功能的女性代理量表项目。对24名女性进行了认知访谈,以了解她们对决策、行动自由和性别态度量表项目的理解。大多数女性最初报告说,她们自己做决定;然而,进一步的调查显示并非如此。虽然妇女似乎如预期的那样理解行动自由项目,但衡量性别态度的项目通常反映的是更广泛的当地社会规范,而不是妇女自己的意见。本研究强调,在将代理量表应用于新环境之前,需要更深入地探索女性对代理量表的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meanings of Women’s Agency: A Case Study from Qatar on Improving Measurement in Context
Abstract The measurement of women’s agency poses numerous challenges, including multi-dimensionality and context-specificity. This challenge is especially large for non-Western contexts that adapt measurement instruments without rigorous testing and comprehensive understanding of construct meanings in place. In this paper, we present a case study from Qatar where we investigate the face validity, comprehension and functionality of women’s agency scale items. Cognitive interviews were conducted with twenty-four women to capture their interpretations of decision-making, freedom-of-movement, and gender attitudes scale items. The majority of women originally reported that they made their own decisions; yet, further probing revealed otherwise. While women seemed to understand, as intended, the freedom-of-movement item, the items measuring gender attitudes were generally reflective of broader local societal norms rather than the women’s own opinions. This research highlights the need for deeper exploration into women’s understanding of an agency scale before its use in a new context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arabian Studies
Journal of Arabian Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信