大肠癌术后监测:光学结肠镜检查优于计算机断层扫描结肠成像。

IF 13.8 1区 计算机科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
David S Weinberg, Jeremy Mitnick, Eileen Keenan, Tianyu Li, Eric A Ross
{"title":"大肠癌术后监测:光学结肠镜检查优于计算机断层扫描结肠成像。","authors":"David S Weinberg, Jeremy Mitnick, Eileen Keenan, Tianyu Li, Eric A Ross","doi":"10.1007/s10552-019-01231-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Post-operative surveillance strategies for colorectal cancer (CRC) include periodic optical colonoscopy (OC) and abdominal-pelvic CT scan. Adherence with these recommendations is limited. For CRC screening, CT colonography (CTC) identifies larger adenomas and cancers nearly as well as OC. Most screening studies demonstrate that patients prefer CTC. However, CTC has never been compared to OC in the post-operative surveillance setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We hypothesized that CTC might represent an attractive substitute for the standard OC/CT scan combination. Here, 223 patients underwent CTC followed by same day OC 1 year after curative CRC resection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 144/223 (64.6%) participants with a preference, 65.9% (95/144) preferred OC. This preference was more pronounced in women and in patients with polyps detected. No additional patient level factors significantly altered this primary result.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contrast to CRC screening, this first study in CRC post-operative surveillance patients demonstrates a preference for OC. Assuming patient preference is an important determinant, introduction of CTC as a method to increase patient adherence with CRC surveillance is unlikely to be effective.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trials.gov registration number: NCT02143115.</p>","PeriodicalId":13243,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications","volume":"22 1","pages":"1269-1273"},"PeriodicalIF":13.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534185/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-operative colorectal cancer surveillance: preference for optical colonoscopy over computerized tomographic colonography.\",\"authors\":\"David S Weinberg, Jeremy Mitnick, Eileen Keenan, Tianyu Li, Eric A Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10552-019-01231-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Post-operative surveillance strategies for colorectal cancer (CRC) include periodic optical colonoscopy (OC) and abdominal-pelvic CT scan. Adherence with these recommendations is limited. For CRC screening, CT colonography (CTC) identifies larger adenomas and cancers nearly as well as OC. Most screening studies demonstrate that patients prefer CTC. However, CTC has never been compared to OC in the post-operative surveillance setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We hypothesized that CTC might represent an attractive substitute for the standard OC/CT scan combination. Here, 223 patients underwent CTC followed by same day OC 1 year after curative CRC resection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 144/223 (64.6%) participants with a preference, 65.9% (95/144) preferred OC. This preference was more pronounced in women and in patients with polyps detected. No additional patient level factors significantly altered this primary result.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contrast to CRC screening, this first study in CRC post-operative surveillance patients demonstrates a preference for OC. Assuming patient preference is an important determinant, introduction of CTC as a method to increase patient adherence with CRC surveillance is unlikely to be effective.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trials.gov registration number: NCT02143115.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"1269-1273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534185/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-019-01231-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/9/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-019-01231-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:结直肠癌 (CRC) 术后监测策略包括定期进行光学结肠镜检查 (OC) 和腹盆腔 CT 扫描。这些建议的坚持率有限。在 CRC 筛查中,CT 结肠造影 (CTC) 几乎能像 OC 一样识别较大的腺瘤和癌症。大多数筛查研究表明,患者更喜欢 CTC。但在术后监测方面,CTC 还从未与 OC 进行过比较:我们假设 CTC 可能是标准 OC/CT 扫描组合的一种有吸引力的替代方法。在此,223 名患者在接受治愈性 CRC 切除术 1 年后接受了 CTC,随后在同一天接受了 OC:在144/223(64.6%)名有偏好的参与者中,65.9%(95/144)的人偏好OC。这种偏好在女性和发现息肉的患者中更为明显。没有其他患者层面的因素会明显改变这一主要结果:与 CRC 筛查不同,这项针对 CRC 术后监测患者的首次研究表明,患者更倾向于选择 OC。假设患者的偏好是一个重要的决定因素,那么采用 CTC 作为提高患者对 CRC 监测的依从性的方法不太可能有效:试验注册:Clinical Trials.gov 注册号:NCT02143115:试验注册:Clinical Trials.gov 注册号:NCT02143115。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-operative colorectal cancer surveillance: preference for optical colonoscopy over computerized tomographic colonography.

Purpose: Post-operative surveillance strategies for colorectal cancer (CRC) include periodic optical colonoscopy (OC) and abdominal-pelvic CT scan. Adherence with these recommendations is limited. For CRC screening, CT colonography (CTC) identifies larger adenomas and cancers nearly as well as OC. Most screening studies demonstrate that patients prefer CTC. However, CTC has never been compared to OC in the post-operative surveillance setting.

Methods: We hypothesized that CTC might represent an attractive substitute for the standard OC/CT scan combination. Here, 223 patients underwent CTC followed by same day OC 1 year after curative CRC resection.

Results: Of the 144/223 (64.6%) participants with a preference, 65.9% (95/144) preferred OC. This preference was more pronounced in women and in patients with polyps detected. No additional patient level factors significantly altered this primary result.

Conclusions: In contrast to CRC screening, this first study in CRC post-operative surveillance patients demonstrates a preference for OC. Assuming patient preference is an important determinant, introduction of CTC as a method to increase patient adherence with CRC surveillance is unlikely to be effective.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov registration number: NCT02143115.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
30.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (JSAC) is a prestigious journal that covers various topics related to Computer Networks and Communications (Q1) as well as Electrical and Electronic Engineering (Q1). Each issue of JSAC is dedicated to a specific technical topic, providing readers with an up-to-date collection of papers in that area. The journal is highly regarded within the research community and serves as a valuable reference. The topics covered by JSAC issues span the entire field of communications and networking, with recent issue themes including Network Coding for Wireless Communication Networks, Wireless and Pervasive Communications for Healthcare, Network Infrastructure Configuration, Broadband Access Networks: Architectures and Protocols, Body Area Networking: Technology and Applications, Underwater Wireless Communication Networks, Game Theory in Communication Systems, and Exploiting Limited Feedback in Tomorrow’s Communication Networks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信