知识管理研究的方法论文献综述

Sachin K. Patil, R. Kant
{"title":"知识管理研究的方法论文献综述","authors":"Sachin K. Patil,&nbsp;R. Kant","doi":"10.1016/j.tekhne.2014.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this paper is to examine the state of KM research from the standpoint of existing methodologies. The state of KM research is assessed by examining the research design, number of hypothesis testing, research methods, data analysis techniques and level of analysis. The review of KM research is based on 344 published articles where has KM in their title, which is published in seven journals. Major findings show that qualitative research methods such as a case study and conceptual models hold greater credibility. The gaps identified in the review were (a) the research at an inter organizational level is very less, (b) hypothesis testing is being done in very less number of articles and maximum articles have done only conceptual analysis, and (c) mathematical models are used in very limited articles. This methodological review will provide a better understanding of the current state of research in the KM discipline.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101212,"journal":{"name":"Tékhne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tekhne.2014.07.001","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodological literature review of knowledge management research\",\"authors\":\"Sachin K. Patil,&nbsp;R. Kant\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tekhne.2014.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The purpose of this paper is to examine the state of KM research from the standpoint of existing methodologies. The state of KM research is assessed by examining the research design, number of hypothesis testing, research methods, data analysis techniques and level of analysis. The review of KM research is based on 344 published articles where has KM in their title, which is published in seven journals. Major findings show that qualitative research methods such as a case study and conceptual models hold greater credibility. The gaps identified in the review were (a) the research at an inter organizational level is very less, (b) hypothesis testing is being done in very less number of articles and maximum articles have done only conceptual analysis, and (c) mathematical models are used in very limited articles. This methodological review will provide a better understanding of the current state of research in the KM discipline.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tékhne\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tekhne.2014.07.001\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tékhne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1645991114000048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tékhne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1645991114000048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

本文的目的是从现有方法的角度来考察知识管理研究的现状。通过考察研究设计、假设检验的数量、研究方法、数据分析技术和分析水平来评估知识管理研究的状态。此次对KM研究的评价是以在7个期刊上发表的344篇题为KM的文章为基础的。主要研究结果表明,定性研究方法,如案例研究和概念模型具有更高的可信度。审查中发现的差距是(a)在组织间一级的研究非常少,(b)在极少数文章中进行假设检验,大多数文章只进行了概念分析,(c)在非常有限的文章中使用了数学模型。这一方法学综述将有助于更好地理解知识管理学科的研究现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methodological literature review of knowledge management research

The purpose of this paper is to examine the state of KM research from the standpoint of existing methodologies. The state of KM research is assessed by examining the research design, number of hypothesis testing, research methods, data analysis techniques and level of analysis. The review of KM research is based on 344 published articles where has KM in their title, which is published in seven journals. Major findings show that qualitative research methods such as a case study and conceptual models hold greater credibility. The gaps identified in the review were (a) the research at an inter organizational level is very less, (b) hypothesis testing is being done in very less number of articles and maximum articles have done only conceptual analysis, and (c) mathematical models are used in very limited articles. This methodological review will provide a better understanding of the current state of research in the KM discipline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信