交叉对接作业不确定性的系统文献综述

Allahyar Ardakani, Jiangang Fei
{"title":"交叉对接作业不确定性的系统文献综述","authors":"Allahyar Ardakani, Jiangang Fei","doi":"10.1108/mscra-04-2019-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe technique of cross-docking is attractive to organisations because of the lower warehousing and transportation (consolidated shipments) costs. This concept is based on the fast movement of products. Accordingly, cross-docking operations should be monitored carefully and accurately. Several factors in cross-docking operations can be impacted by uncertain sources that can lead to inaccuracy and inefficiency of this process. Although many papers have been published on different aspects of cross-docking, there is a need for a comprehensive review to investigate the sources of uncertainties in cross-docking. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to analyse and categorise sources of uncertainty in cross-docking operations. A systematic review has been undertaken to analyse methods and techniques used in cross-docking research.Design/methodology/approachA systematic review has been undertaken to analyse methods and techniques used in cross-docking research.FindingsThe findings show that existing research has limitations on the applicability of the models developed to solve problems due to unrealistic or impractical assumption. Further research directions have been discussed to fill the gaps identified in the literature review.Originality/valueThere has been an increasing number of papers about cross-docking since 2010, among which three are literature reviews on cross-docking from 2013 to 2016. There is an absence of study in the current literature to critically review and identify the sources of uncertainty related to cross-docking operations. Without the proper identification and discussion of these uncertainties, the optimisation models developed to improve cross-docking operations may be inherently impractical and unrealistic.","PeriodicalId":18614,"journal":{"name":"Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic literature review on uncertainties in cross-docking operations\",\"authors\":\"Allahyar Ardakani, Jiangang Fei\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/mscra-04-2019-0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe technique of cross-docking is attractive to organisations because of the lower warehousing and transportation (consolidated shipments) costs. This concept is based on the fast movement of products. Accordingly, cross-docking operations should be monitored carefully and accurately. Several factors in cross-docking operations can be impacted by uncertain sources that can lead to inaccuracy and inefficiency of this process. Although many papers have been published on different aspects of cross-docking, there is a need for a comprehensive review to investigate the sources of uncertainties in cross-docking. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to analyse and categorise sources of uncertainty in cross-docking operations. A systematic review has been undertaken to analyse methods and techniques used in cross-docking research.Design/methodology/approachA systematic review has been undertaken to analyse methods and techniques used in cross-docking research.FindingsThe findings show that existing research has limitations on the applicability of the models developed to solve problems due to unrealistic or impractical assumption. Further research directions have been discussed to fill the gaps identified in the literature review.Originality/valueThere has been an increasing number of papers about cross-docking since 2010, among which three are literature reviews on cross-docking from 2013 to 2016. There is an absence of study in the current literature to critically review and identify the sources of uncertainty related to cross-docking operations. Without the proper identification and discussion of these uncertainties, the optimisation models developed to improve cross-docking operations may be inherently impractical and unrealistic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/mscra-04-2019-0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mscra-04-2019-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的交叉对接的技术是有吸引力的组织,因为较低的仓储和运输(合并运输)成本。这个概念是基于产品的快速移动。因此,应仔细、准确地监控交叉对接操作。交叉对接操作中的几个因素可能受到不确定来源的影响,从而导致该过程的不准确和低效率。虽然关于交叉对接的不同方面已经发表了许多论文,但有必要对交叉对接中不确定性的来源进行全面的综述。因此,本文的目的是分析和分类交叉对接操作中的不确定性来源。已进行系统审查,分析交叉对接研究中使用的方法和技术。设计/方法/方法进行了系统的审查,以分析交叉对接研究中使用的方法和技术。研究结果表明,由于假设不现实或不切实际,现有研究对解决问题的模型的适用性存在局限性。讨论了进一步的研究方向,以填补文献综述中发现的空白。独创性/价值自2010年以来,关于交叉对接的论文越来越多,其中有3篇是2013 - 2016年关于交叉对接的文献综述。在目前的文献中,缺乏对交叉对接操作相关的不确定性来源进行批判性审查和确定的研究。如果没有对这些不确定性的适当识别和讨论,为改进交叉对接操作而开发的优化模型可能本质上是不切实际的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic literature review on uncertainties in cross-docking operations
PurposeThe technique of cross-docking is attractive to organisations because of the lower warehousing and transportation (consolidated shipments) costs. This concept is based on the fast movement of products. Accordingly, cross-docking operations should be monitored carefully and accurately. Several factors in cross-docking operations can be impacted by uncertain sources that can lead to inaccuracy and inefficiency of this process. Although many papers have been published on different aspects of cross-docking, there is a need for a comprehensive review to investigate the sources of uncertainties in cross-docking. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to analyse and categorise sources of uncertainty in cross-docking operations. A systematic review has been undertaken to analyse methods and techniques used in cross-docking research.Design/methodology/approachA systematic review has been undertaken to analyse methods and techniques used in cross-docking research.FindingsThe findings show that existing research has limitations on the applicability of the models developed to solve problems due to unrealistic or impractical assumption. Further research directions have been discussed to fill the gaps identified in the literature review.Originality/valueThere has been an increasing number of papers about cross-docking since 2010, among which three are literature reviews on cross-docking from 2013 to 2016. There is an absence of study in the current literature to critically review and identify the sources of uncertainty related to cross-docking operations. Without the proper identification and discussion of these uncertainties, the optimisation models developed to improve cross-docking operations may be inherently impractical and unrealistic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信