评估地震危险地图的使用和传播:以加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省大温哥华为例

Meredith Fyfe, S. Molnar
{"title":"评估地震危险地图的使用和传播:以加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省大温哥华为例","authors":"Meredith Fyfe, S. Molnar","doi":"10.2495/risk200141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Metro Vancouver region of southwestern British Columbia, Canada, is exposed to significant earthquake risk. Earthquake hazard has yet to be mapped to an effective scale in Metro Vancouver and so it is critical to generate comprehensive seismic hazard maps for the region. The Metro Vancouver Seismic Microzonation Project is tasked with the assessment and mapping of earthquake shaking hazard and liquefaction and landslide susceptibility hazards at a 1:25,000 scale. The detailed hazard information and data collected as part of this project, like most traditional hazard studies, is highly technical and unsuitable for the needs of intermediate users (e.g. regional planners and emergency managers). In this study we evaluate metrics and delivery format used to communicate seismic hazard information to intermediate users so it may be applied effectively in regional planning and emergency management strategies. Our methodology to evaluate effective communication of the seismic hazard products (GIS shapefiles and maps) involves a stakeholder workshop and online questionnaire survey. Existing microzonation maps for other regions in Canada are referenced throughout this consultation process and feedback is used as a benchmark to develop upon. A sequence of iterative discussion and consultation is necessary to determine the comprehensible metrics, desired interaction level and stylistic preferences to be used in final mapped products. Responses reiterate that the use of technical metrics is not effective in communicating hazard to intermediate users; separate map products are required for primary and intermediate users. Additionally, participants express importance of visual simplicity, open access to background data and interactive capabilities (e.g. GIS shapefiles). Feedback indicates that a lack of standardization leads to misinterpretation when comparing seismic microzonation maps of different regions; thus, results of this consultation process are integrated into a set of preliminary recommendations for producing seismic microzonation maps in a move towards standardization.","PeriodicalId":23647,"journal":{"name":"WIT transactions on engineering sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"157-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUATING THE USE AND COMMUNICATION OF SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS: A CASE STUDY OF METRO VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA\",\"authors\":\"Meredith Fyfe, S. Molnar\",\"doi\":\"10.2495/risk200141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Metro Vancouver region of southwestern British Columbia, Canada, is exposed to significant earthquake risk. Earthquake hazard has yet to be mapped to an effective scale in Metro Vancouver and so it is critical to generate comprehensive seismic hazard maps for the region. The Metro Vancouver Seismic Microzonation Project is tasked with the assessment and mapping of earthquake shaking hazard and liquefaction and landslide susceptibility hazards at a 1:25,000 scale. The detailed hazard information and data collected as part of this project, like most traditional hazard studies, is highly technical and unsuitable for the needs of intermediate users (e.g. regional planners and emergency managers). In this study we evaluate metrics and delivery format used to communicate seismic hazard information to intermediate users so it may be applied effectively in regional planning and emergency management strategies. Our methodology to evaluate effective communication of the seismic hazard products (GIS shapefiles and maps) involves a stakeholder workshop and online questionnaire survey. Existing microzonation maps for other regions in Canada are referenced throughout this consultation process and feedback is used as a benchmark to develop upon. A sequence of iterative discussion and consultation is necessary to determine the comprehensible metrics, desired interaction level and stylistic preferences to be used in final mapped products. Responses reiterate that the use of technical metrics is not effective in communicating hazard to intermediate users; separate map products are required for primary and intermediate users. Additionally, participants express importance of visual simplicity, open access to background data and interactive capabilities (e.g. GIS shapefiles). Feedback indicates that a lack of standardization leads to misinterpretation when comparing seismic microzonation maps of different regions; thus, results of this consultation process are integrated into a set of preliminary recommendations for producing seismic microzonation maps in a move towards standardization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WIT transactions on engineering sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"157-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WIT transactions on engineering sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2495/risk200141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIT transactions on engineering sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/risk200141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省西南部的大温哥华地区面临着巨大的地震风险。在大温哥华地区,地震灾害尚未绘制成有效的规模,因此为该地区生成全面的地震灾害地图至关重要。大温哥华地震区划项目的任务是以1:25 000的比例评估和绘制地震震动危险、液化和滑坡易感性危险。与大多数传统的危害研究一样,作为该项目一部分收集的详细危害资料和数据技术性很强,不适合中级用户(例如区域规划人员和应急管理人员)的需要。在这项研究中,我们评估了用于向中间用户传达地震危险信息的度量和交付格式,以便它可以有效地应用于区域规划和应急管理策略。我们评估地震灾害产品(GIS形状文件和地图)有效沟通的方法包括利益相关者研讨会和在线问卷调查。在整个咨询过程中,加拿大其他地区的现有微区划地图被参考,反馈被用作开发的基准。为了确定最终地图产品中使用的可理解的度量、期望的交互级别和风格偏好,有必要进行一系列的迭代讨论和咨询。回应重申,技术指标的使用在向中间用户传达危害方面是无效的;初级和中级用户需要单独的地图产品。此外,参与者还表达了视觉简洁性、对背景数据的开放访问和交互能力(如GIS形状文件)的重要性。反馈表明,在比较不同地区地震微区划图时,由于缺乏标准化,造成了误读;因此,这一协商过程的结果被纳入一套初步建议,用于制作地震微区划图,以实现标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EVALUATING THE USE AND COMMUNICATION OF SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS: A CASE STUDY OF METRO VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA
The Metro Vancouver region of southwestern British Columbia, Canada, is exposed to significant earthquake risk. Earthquake hazard has yet to be mapped to an effective scale in Metro Vancouver and so it is critical to generate comprehensive seismic hazard maps for the region. The Metro Vancouver Seismic Microzonation Project is tasked with the assessment and mapping of earthquake shaking hazard and liquefaction and landslide susceptibility hazards at a 1:25,000 scale. The detailed hazard information and data collected as part of this project, like most traditional hazard studies, is highly technical and unsuitable for the needs of intermediate users (e.g. regional planners and emergency managers). In this study we evaluate metrics and delivery format used to communicate seismic hazard information to intermediate users so it may be applied effectively in regional planning and emergency management strategies. Our methodology to evaluate effective communication of the seismic hazard products (GIS shapefiles and maps) involves a stakeholder workshop and online questionnaire survey. Existing microzonation maps for other regions in Canada are referenced throughout this consultation process and feedback is used as a benchmark to develop upon. A sequence of iterative discussion and consultation is necessary to determine the comprehensible metrics, desired interaction level and stylistic preferences to be used in final mapped products. Responses reiterate that the use of technical metrics is not effective in communicating hazard to intermediate users; separate map products are required for primary and intermediate users. Additionally, participants express importance of visual simplicity, open access to background data and interactive capabilities (e.g. GIS shapefiles). Feedback indicates that a lack of standardization leads to misinterpretation when comparing seismic microzonation maps of different regions; thus, results of this consultation process are integrated into a set of preliminary recommendations for producing seismic microzonation maps in a move towards standardization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信