造口旁疝修补术的后期效果

N. V. Malgina, G. Rodoman, T. U. Dolgina
{"title":"造口旁疝修补术的后期效果","authors":"N. V. Malgina, G. Rodoman, T. U. Dolgina","doi":"10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-2-79-85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM: to assess late results of parastomal hernia repair using Sugarbaker’s technique modifications.PATIENTS AND METHODS: prospective non-randomised study included 60 patients with parastomal hernia, which underwent surgery in 2013-2019. Patients were divided in two groups. The control group included 30 patients with “classic” Sugabacker method, the main group included 30 patients with Sugarbaker’s procedure added by suture of abdominal wall defect. Both groups were homogenous by age, gender, hernia size, type of primal disease and preoperative quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). The efficacy of the treatment was estimated by recurrence rate and quality of life 1 and 2 years after surgery.RESULTS: the recurrence rate in the main group was significantly lower after 1 and 2 years (3 vs 13; p = 0.01). Quality of life in the main group was significantly higher after the first year of follow-up (the median of the weighted coefficient 0.92 vs 0.89; p = 0.04) and this trend has preserved 2 years after surgery.CONCLUSION: suture of abdominal wall defect in Sugarbaker’s procedure for parastomal hernia reduces recurrence rate significantly and provides better quality of life.","PeriodicalId":17840,"journal":{"name":"Koloproktologia","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Late outcomes of parastomal hernia repair\",\"authors\":\"N. V. Malgina, G. Rodoman, T. U. Dolgina\",\"doi\":\"10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-2-79-85\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIM: to assess late results of parastomal hernia repair using Sugarbaker’s technique modifications.PATIENTS AND METHODS: prospective non-randomised study included 60 patients with parastomal hernia, which underwent surgery in 2013-2019. Patients were divided in two groups. The control group included 30 patients with “classic” Sugabacker method, the main group included 30 patients with Sugarbaker’s procedure added by suture of abdominal wall defect. Both groups were homogenous by age, gender, hernia size, type of primal disease and preoperative quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). The efficacy of the treatment was estimated by recurrence rate and quality of life 1 and 2 years after surgery.RESULTS: the recurrence rate in the main group was significantly lower after 1 and 2 years (3 vs 13; p = 0.01). Quality of life in the main group was significantly higher after the first year of follow-up (the median of the weighted coefficient 0.92 vs 0.89; p = 0.04) and this trend has preserved 2 years after surgery.CONCLUSION: suture of abdominal wall defect in Sugarbaker’s procedure for parastomal hernia reduces recurrence rate significantly and provides better quality of life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Koloproktologia\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Koloproktologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-2-79-85\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koloproktologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-2-79-85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价Sugarbaker技术改良修复造口旁疝的后期效果。患者和方法:前瞻性非随机研究纳入了60例造口旁疝患者,这些患者于2013-2019年接受了手术。患者分为两组。对照组30例采用“经典”Sugarbaker方法,主组30例采用Sugarbaker方法加腹壁缺损缝合。两组患者的年龄、性别、疝大小、原发疾病类型和术前生活质量(EQ-5D-5L)均相同。通过术后1年和2年的复发率和生活质量来评估治疗效果。结果:主组1年和2年复发率显著低于对照组(3 vs 13;P = 0.01)。随访一年后,主组患者的生活质量显著提高(加权系数中位数0.92 vs 0.89;P = 0.04),术后2年仍保持这一趋势。结论:Sugarbaker术中腹壁缺损缝合治疗造口旁疝可显著降低复发率,提高患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Late outcomes of parastomal hernia repair
AIM: to assess late results of parastomal hernia repair using Sugarbaker’s technique modifications.PATIENTS AND METHODS: prospective non-randomised study included 60 patients with parastomal hernia, which underwent surgery in 2013-2019. Patients were divided in two groups. The control group included 30 patients with “classic” Sugabacker method, the main group included 30 patients with Sugarbaker’s procedure added by suture of abdominal wall defect. Both groups were homogenous by age, gender, hernia size, type of primal disease and preoperative quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). The efficacy of the treatment was estimated by recurrence rate and quality of life 1 and 2 years after surgery.RESULTS: the recurrence rate in the main group was significantly lower after 1 and 2 years (3 vs 13; p = 0.01). Quality of life in the main group was significantly higher after the first year of follow-up (the median of the weighted coefficient 0.92 vs 0.89; p = 0.04) and this trend has preserved 2 years after surgery.CONCLUSION: suture of abdominal wall defect in Sugarbaker’s procedure for parastomal hernia reduces recurrence rate significantly and provides better quality of life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信