企业间技术异质性情况下的技术效率测量——基于波兰农场的证据

IF 1.9 4区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
J. Marzec, Andrzej Pisulewski
{"title":"企业间技术异质性情况下的技术效率测量——基于波兰农场的证据","authors":"J. Marzec, Andrzej Pisulewski","doi":"10.17221/347/2020-AGRICECON","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present study, we have investigated several competing stochastic frontier models which differ in terms of the form of the production function (Cobb-Douglas or translog), inefficiency distribution (half-normal or exponential distribution) and type of prior distribution for the parameters (hierarchical or non-hierarchical from the Bayesian point of view). This last distinction corresponds to a difference between random coefficients and fixed coefficients models. Consequently, this study aims to examine to what extent inferences about estimates of farms' efficiency depend on the above assumptions. Moreover, the study intends to investigate how far the production function's characteristics are affected by the choice of the type of prior distribution for the parameters. First of all, it was found that the form of the production function does not impact the efficiency scores. Secondly, we found that measures of technical efficiency are sensitive to distributional assumptions about the inefficiency term. Finally, we have revealed that estimates of technical efficiency are reasonably robust to the prior information about the parameters of crop farms' production technology. There is also a resemblance in the elasticity of output with respect to inputs between the models considered in this paper. Additionally, the measurement of returns to scale is not sensitive to model specification.","PeriodicalId":48961,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics-Zemedelska Ekonomika","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of technical efficiency in the case of heterogeneity of technologies used between firms – Based on evidence from Polish crop farms\",\"authors\":\"J. Marzec, Andrzej Pisulewski\",\"doi\":\"10.17221/347/2020-AGRICECON\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the present study, we have investigated several competing stochastic frontier models which differ in terms of the form of the production function (Cobb-Douglas or translog), inefficiency distribution (half-normal or exponential distribution) and type of prior distribution for the parameters (hierarchical or non-hierarchical from the Bayesian point of view). This last distinction corresponds to a difference between random coefficients and fixed coefficients models. Consequently, this study aims to examine to what extent inferences about estimates of farms' efficiency depend on the above assumptions. Moreover, the study intends to investigate how far the production function's characteristics are affected by the choice of the type of prior distribution for the parameters. First of all, it was found that the form of the production function does not impact the efficiency scores. Secondly, we found that measures of technical efficiency are sensitive to distributional assumptions about the inefficiency term. Finally, we have revealed that estimates of technical efficiency are reasonably robust to the prior information about the parameters of crop farms' production technology. There is also a resemblance in the elasticity of output with respect to inputs between the models considered in this paper. Additionally, the measurement of returns to scale is not sensitive to model specification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Economics-Zemedelska Ekonomika\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Economics-Zemedelska Ekonomika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17221/347/2020-AGRICECON\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Economics-Zemedelska Ekonomika","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17221/347/2020-AGRICECON","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在本研究中,我们研究了几个相互竞争的随机前沿模型,这些模型在生产函数的形式(柯布-道格拉斯或超对数)、低效率分布(半正态分布或指数分布)和参数的先验分布类型(从贝叶斯的角度来看是分层的或非分层的)方面有所不同。最后一个区别对应于随机系数和固定系数模型之间的差异。因此,本研究旨在检验对农场效率估计的推断在多大程度上取决于上述假设。此外,本研究旨在探讨生产函数的特征在多大程度上受到参数先验分布类型选择的影响。首先,我们发现生产函数的形式对效率得分没有影响。其次,我们发现技术效率度量对无效率项的分配假设很敏感。最后,我们发现技术效率的估计对作物农场生产技术参数的先验信息具有相当强的鲁棒性。在本文所考虑的模型之间,输出相对于输入的弹性也有相似之处。此外,规模回报的测量对模型规格不敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measurement of technical efficiency in the case of heterogeneity of technologies used between firms – Based on evidence from Polish crop farms
In the present study, we have investigated several competing stochastic frontier models which differ in terms of the form of the production function (Cobb-Douglas or translog), inefficiency distribution (half-normal or exponential distribution) and type of prior distribution for the parameters (hierarchical or non-hierarchical from the Bayesian point of view). This last distinction corresponds to a difference between random coefficients and fixed coefficients models. Consequently, this study aims to examine to what extent inferences about estimates of farms' efficiency depend on the above assumptions. Moreover, the study intends to investigate how far the production function's characteristics are affected by the choice of the type of prior distribution for the parameters. First of all, it was found that the form of the production function does not impact the efficiency scores. Secondly, we found that measures of technical efficiency are sensitive to distributional assumptions about the inefficiency term. Finally, we have revealed that estimates of technical efficiency are reasonably robust to the prior information about the parameters of crop farms' production technology. There is also a resemblance in the elasticity of output with respect to inputs between the models considered in this paper. Additionally, the measurement of returns to scale is not sensitive to model specification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Economics-Zemedelska Ekonomika
Agricultural Economics-Zemedelska Ekonomika Agricultural Economics & Policy-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
47
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: An international peer-reviewed journal published under the auspices of the Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences and financed by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. Published since 1954 (by 1999 under the title Zemědělská ekonomika).Thematic scope: original scientific papers dealing with agricultural subjects from the sphere of economics, management, informatics, ecology, social economy and sociology. Since 1993 the papers continually treat problems which were published in the journal Sociologie venkova a zemědělství until now. An extensive scope of subjects in fact covers the whole of agribusiness, that means economic relations of suppliers and producers of inputs for agriculture and food industry, problems from the aspects of social economy and rural sociology and finally the economics of the population nutrition. Papers are published in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信